2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2011.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of two perfluorinated compounds (PFOS and PFOA) on human hepatoma cells: Cytotoxicity but no genotoxicity?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
33
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1A illustrates the viability of the cells which were exposed to PFOS or PFOA solution alone for 3 h. The cell viability was not affected by PFOA at all the tested concentrations (100, 200, 300 and 400 lM), but was slightly inhibited by PFOS at 300 and 400 lM. In the other words, both PFOS and PFOA with a concentration lower than 200 lM did not affect the cell viability in 3 h. The results agree with the study of Florentin et al, who conducted MTT assay for 1 h and 24 h (Florentin et al, 2011). But Hu and Hu reported that exposure to 150 lM PFOS for 24 h could cause a decrease of cell viability by 8%, while treatment with 100 lM PFOS or PFOA for 24 h did not show significant impacts on the cell viability (Hu and Hu, 2009).…”
Section: Combined Cytotoxicity Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…1A illustrates the viability of the cells which were exposed to PFOS or PFOA solution alone for 3 h. The cell viability was not affected by PFOA at all the tested concentrations (100, 200, 300 and 400 lM), but was slightly inhibited by PFOS at 300 and 400 lM. In the other words, both PFOS and PFOA with a concentration lower than 200 lM did not affect the cell viability in 3 h. The results agree with the study of Florentin et al, who conducted MTT assay for 1 h and 24 h (Florentin et al, 2011). But Hu and Hu reported that exposure to 150 lM PFOS for 24 h could cause a decrease of cell viability by 8%, while treatment with 100 lM PFOS or PFOA for 24 h did not show significant impacts on the cell viability (Hu and Hu, 2009).…”
Section: Combined Cytotoxicity Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Significant increases in DNA damage were detected using the comet assay in HepG2 cells exposed to PFOS at concentrations ranging from 0.2 to 20 μM for 24 hours 74 . However, negative comet assay results were reported in HepG2 cells exposed to PFOS at concentrations ranging from 5 to 300 μM for 1 or 24 hours 75 . Furthermore, no induction of micronuclei was observed in HepG2 cells exposed to the same concentrations of PFOS that were used for the 24-hour comet assay 75 .…”
Section: Genetic Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, a number of studies involving PFASs have focused on increasing general knowledge on their toxicity (Florentin, Deblonde, Diguio, Hautemaniere, & Hartemann, 2011;Fuentes, Colomina, Vicens, Franco-Pons, & Domingo, 2007;Johansson, Eriksson, & Viberg, 2009;Ribes, Fuentes, Torrente, Colomina, & Domingo, 2010), environmental distribution and fate (Houde et al, 2011;Martin, Whittle, Muir, & Mabury, 2004;Nakata et al, 2006;Yamashita et al, 2005), as well as potential human health risks of exposure to these pollutants, especially to PFOS and PFOA (Cornelis et al, 2012;Domingo, 2012;Egeghy & Lorber, 2011;Haug, Huber, Becher, & Thomsen, 2011;Liu et al, 2010;Zhao et al, 2011). However, significant gaps still exist on that knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%