“…In the case of Singapore for the period 1970-2010, and found that tourism improved environmental quality [18]. This finding is also in line with the case of Ubud tourist destination, Bali, Indonesia, nevertheless the environmental pressure from tourism activities needs additional attention in the long run [19]. On the other hand, few studies provided evidence of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis and claimed that the impact of tourism on environmental degradation to reduced more so for developed countries compared to developing countries [20].…”
The purpose of this current study is to assess the effect of tourism density on the environmental performance index on 10 ASEAN countries from 2002 to 2017. This study adopted panel data regressions with the Driscoll and Kraay standard. This method accounts for cross-sectional dependence, heteroskedasticity, autocorrelation, and the possible correlation between countries when observing the environmental performance index and tourism density. Empirical results found a statistically significant and negative relationship between the tourism density index and the environmental performance index in 10 ASEAN countries. This result implied that an increase in the tourism density index will deteriorate the environmental performance index. The results of this study underline the need for sustainable tourism policies and practices in tourism destinations to be executed by the local stakeholders and policymaker to accelerating the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in ASEAN countries. In addition, this study offers justification for the policymaker to give careful attention to the carrying capacity of a tourist destination.
“…In the case of Singapore for the period 1970-2010, and found that tourism improved environmental quality [18]. This finding is also in line with the case of Ubud tourist destination, Bali, Indonesia, nevertheless the environmental pressure from tourism activities needs additional attention in the long run [19]. On the other hand, few studies provided evidence of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis and claimed that the impact of tourism on environmental degradation to reduced more so for developed countries compared to developing countries [20].…”
The purpose of this current study is to assess the effect of tourism density on the environmental performance index on 10 ASEAN countries from 2002 to 2017. This study adopted panel data regressions with the Driscoll and Kraay standard. This method accounts for cross-sectional dependence, heteroskedasticity, autocorrelation, and the possible correlation between countries when observing the environmental performance index and tourism density. Empirical results found a statistically significant and negative relationship between the tourism density index and the environmental performance index in 10 ASEAN countries. This result implied that an increase in the tourism density index will deteriorate the environmental performance index. The results of this study underline the need for sustainable tourism policies and practices in tourism destinations to be executed by the local stakeholders and policymaker to accelerating the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in ASEAN countries. In addition, this study offers justification for the policymaker to give careful attention to the carrying capacity of a tourist destination.
“…The third sector is community, although sustainable tourism promotes community participation, protection, development (Ernawati et al, 2018), and improvement of the quality of life for all (France, 1998;Lea, 1988;Roseland, 2005), its top-down approach to distributing empowerment to stakeholders is considered an obstacle to collaborative community participation (Goodwin & Santilli, 2009;Sebele, 2010). Local community need to take apart directly and indirectly (Amerta et al, 2018).…”
The rapid growth of the tourism sector has made the government committed to implementing the principle of sustainable tourism development. To develop regional tourism, it is relatively necessary to direct, integrated, cross-sectoral, and sustainable programs so that the economic benefits of tourism are increasingly felt evenly distributed by the community. Bali, popular as one of the most tourist destinations in the world, is used as an example for the development of a national destination by the Indonesian government by creating 10 new Bali destinations, but this scheme must be postponed due to the covid-19 outbreak that hit Indonesia. This study aims to explore the sustainable tourism strategy in Bali’s village tourism sector using a qualitative approach based on content analysis based on secondary data since Bali has the largest number of village tourism in Indonesia using the Penta-helix model (synergy between academic, business, community, government, and media). With the synergy and collaboration of these five central sectors (especially during decreasing tourism sector of coronavirus outbreak), it is expected to increase awareness and maximizing the potential among the public regarding Bali sustainable tourism.
“…Pariwisata menjadi salah satu sektor yang terus dikembangkan di Indonesia karena telah terbukti memberikan dampak positif. Beberapa manfaat dari pengembangan pariwisata yaitu menciptakan lapangan kerja, meningkatkan kesejahteraan masyarakat, dan meningkatkan pendapatan bagi perekonomian daerah (Departemen Kebudayaan dan Pariwisata, 2009;Ernawati et al 2017). Salah satu wujud pengembangan pariwisata adalah pengembangan desa sebagai objek wisata.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.