The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of Touch Screen Size, User Interface Design, and Subtask Boundaries on In-Car Task's Visual Demand and Driver Distraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Drivers observe the instrument panel more frequently than the central control screen, but the auxiliary functions of most models on the market are displayed on the central control screen, which affects the safety of the driver [10]. Some models even place the instrument panel above the central control screen.…”
Section: Design Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drivers observe the instrument panel more frequently than the central control screen, but the auxiliary functions of most models on the market are displayed on the central control screen, which affects the safety of the driver [10]. Some models even place the instrument panel above the central control screen.…”
Section: Design Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this provided an overall control of these devices the amount of incoming information increased exponentially through the years resulting in a highly attentiondemanding environment that could increase significantly the cognitive workload of the driver [2,3]. Previous studies have identified these User Interfaces (UI) as one of the most prominent reasons for driver distraction [19,20]. Further user familiarization with these interfaces could arguably reduce the distraction effects for some drivers, yet interfaces that serve secondary tasks should be discreet and simple to use particularly whilst the vehicle is in motion.…”
Section: Current Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the accumulated experience analysis of cognitive psychology, the human-machine visual information interface formed by human beings in the application of products is not the content generated after passively receiving information, but the product acquired after active processing in the human brain, in other words, it is the cognitive product. The following is a brief understanding of visual and perceptual interface design based on human-computer interaction tasks [1][2][3]. Visual perception is divided into cognitive and visual receiving part, the former as the main channel of human understand the world and perceive things, the user can use the visual perception will obtain information to the brain for visual perception, eliminate the influence of human body physiology, speed and effectiveness of visual perception and receiving information has a direct relationship.…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%