Abstract:Random telegraph noise (RTN) is one of the important dynamic variation sources in ultrascaled MOSFETs. In this paper, the recently focused ac trap effects of RTN in digital circuits and their impacts on circuit performance are systematically investigated. Instead of trap occupancy probability under dc bias condition ( p dc ), which is traditionally used for RTN characterization, ac trap occupancy probability ( p ac ), i.e., the effective percentage of time trap being occupied under ac bias condition, is propos… Show more
“…The number of traps per device follows the Poisson distribution [3]- [6]. To perform Monte Carlo simulation in the time domain, one needs the captureemission times and RTN amplitude of traps [5], [18], [22], [23]. We studied the statistical distribution of capture/emission time constants in an early work [18] and focus on the amplitude distribution here.…”
The power consumption of digital circuits is proportional to the square of operation voltage and the demand for low power circuits reduces the operation voltage towards the threshold of MOSFETs. A weak voltage signal makes circuits vulnerable to noise and the optimization of circuit design requires modelling noise. Random Telegraph Noise (RTN) is the dominant noise for modern CMOS technologies and Monte Carlo modelling has been used to assess its impact on circuits. This requires statistical distributions of RTN amplitude and three different distributions were proposed by early works: Lognormal, Exponential, and Gumbel distributions. They give substantially different RTN predictions and agreement has not been reached on which distribution should be used, calling the modelling accuracy into questions. The objective of this work is to assess the accuracy of these three distributions and to explore other distributions for better accuracy. A novel criterion has been proposed for selecting distributions, which requires a monotonic reduction of modelling errors with increasing number of traps. The three existing distributions do not meet this criterion and thirteen other distributions are explored. It is found that the Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) distribution has the lowest error and meet the new criterion. Moreover, to reduce modelling errors, early works used bimodal Lognormal and Exponential distributions, which have more fitting parameters. Their errors, however, are still higher than those of the monomodal GEV distribution. GEV has a long distribution tail and predicts substantially worse RTN impact. The work highlights the uncertainty in predicting the RTN distribution tail by different statistical models.
“…The number of traps per device follows the Poisson distribution [3]- [6]. To perform Monte Carlo simulation in the time domain, one needs the captureemission times and RTN amplitude of traps [5], [18], [22], [23]. We studied the statistical distribution of capture/emission time constants in an early work [18] and focus on the amplitude distribution here.…”
The power consumption of digital circuits is proportional to the square of operation voltage and the demand for low power circuits reduces the operation voltage towards the threshold of MOSFETs. A weak voltage signal makes circuits vulnerable to noise and the optimization of circuit design requires modelling noise. Random Telegraph Noise (RTN) is the dominant noise for modern CMOS technologies and Monte Carlo modelling has been used to assess its impact on circuits. This requires statistical distributions of RTN amplitude and three different distributions were proposed by early works: Lognormal, Exponential, and Gumbel distributions. They give substantially different RTN predictions and agreement has not been reached on which distribution should be used, calling the modelling accuracy into questions. The objective of this work is to assess the accuracy of these three distributions and to explore other distributions for better accuracy. A novel criterion has been proposed for selecting distributions, which requires a monotonic reduction of modelling errors with increasing number of traps. The three existing distributions do not meet this criterion and thirteen other distributions are explored. It is found that the Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) distribution has the lowest error and meet the new criterion. Moreover, to reduce modelling errors, early works used bimodal Lognormal and Exponential distributions, which have more fitting parameters. Their errors, however, are still higher than those of the monomodal GEV distribution. GEV has a long distribution tail and predicts substantially worse RTN impact. The work highlights the uncertainty in predicting the RTN distribution tail by different statistical models.
“…To take RTN into account when optimizing circuit design, substantial efforts have been made to model RTN [6]- [11]. For dynamic Monte Carlo modelling, one needs the statistical distributions of the number of traps per device, the amplitude of RTN per trap, and the capture/emission time (CET) of traps [3], [11], [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To take RTN into account when optimizing circuit design, substantial efforts have been made to model RTN [6]- [11]. For dynamic Monte Carlo modelling, one needs the statistical distributions of the number of traps per device, the amplitude of RTN per trap, and the capture/emission time (CET) of traps [3], [11], [12]. Early works [9], [13] have focused their attentions on the amplitude distributions and the CET distribution has been rarely reported based on test data [1], [14]- [17].…”
As transistor sizes are downscaled, a single trapped charge has a larger impact on smaller devices and the Random Telegraph Noise (RTN) becomes increasingly important. To optimize circuit design, one needs assessing the impact of RTN on the circuit and this can only be accomplished if there is an accurate statistical model of RTN. The dynamic Monte Carlo modelling requires the statistical distribution functions of both the amplitude and the capture/emission time (CET) of traps. Early works were focused on the amplitude distribution and the experimental data of CETs were typically too limited to establish their statistical distribution reliably. In particular, the time window used has been often small, e.g. 10 sec or less, so that there are few data on slow traps. It is not known whether the CET distribution extracted from such a limited time window can be used to predict the RTN beyond the test time window. The objectives of this work are three fold: to provide the long term RTN data and use them to test the CET distributions proposed by early works; to propose a methodology for characterizing the CET distribution for a fabrication process efficiently; and, for the first time, to verify the long term prediction capability of a CET distribution beyond the time window used for its extraction.
“…However, the standard RTN procedure [4] only captures the current under constant gate voltage, VG_RTN, which contains limited information. Understanding the entire ID-VG curve and its shift induced by the Random Telegraph Noise (RTN) can provide valuable information in understanding its underlying physical mechanism [5][6][7] and also in the circuit simulation for the time-dependent variability prediction [8,9]. Usually such measurement is carried out by repeating the standard RTN test procedure under different VG levels [10,11].…”
A simple Dual-Point technique to measure the entire transfer characteristics (ID-VG) down to sub-threshold region in the nano-scaled MOSFET under Random Telegraph Noise (RTN) condition with either capturing or emitting one elementary charge by a trap in the gate dielectric is proposed. Its compatibility with the commercial semiconductor analyzer makes it a readily-usable tool for future RTN study. In this work, we use this technique to explore the VG dependence of RTN induced by a single trapped carrier in both n-and p-FETs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.