2019
DOI: 10.1561/112.00000500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of Increasing Bioenergy Production on Timber Harvest and Carbon Emissions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We developed our model based on the work of (Guo and Gong, 2017), (Guo et al, 2019)and (Ekholm, 2020). (Guo and Gong, 2017) model the potential and costs of promoting forest carbon sequestration through a tax/subsidy to forest owners for reducing/increasing carbon storage and show that a higher carbon price would lead to higher forest carbon stocks.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We developed our model based on the work of (Guo and Gong, 2017), (Guo et al, 2019)and (Ekholm, 2020). (Guo and Gong, 2017) model the potential and costs of promoting forest carbon sequestration through a tax/subsidy to forest owners for reducing/increasing carbon storage and show that a higher carbon price would lead to higher forest carbon stocks.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a later paper (Guo et al, 2019) they apply a partial equilibrium model of the Swedish forest sector to assess the impact of increased bioenergy production on timber harvest and forest growing stock. Their results suggest that increased bioenergy production will lead to significantly higher harvests and a net loss of carbon storage in forests.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Woody biomass has a small heat content compared with that of fossil fuels, but it achieves carbon capture through harvesting and planting. Woody biomass is a very effective way to achieve zero emissions [3]. However, because the amount of carbon storage in forests varies depending on the type of building and system [4], external effects, such as the effects of environmental pollution on the environment, also need to be considered [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest ecosystem measurements and related GHG flux quantification are particularly challenging as these ecosystems have significant spatial and temporal variability, species and other environmental heterogeneity and interconnectedness with other ecosystems (Brown, 2002;Pearson et al, 2007;Goetz et al, 2015;Olander and Haugen-Kozyra, 2011). Additionally, forest sector markets are very dynamic, due to ( 1) the inherent integrated nature of forest products manufacturing systems (see Figure 1, Latta et al, 2018), (2) the interconnectedness and fluidity of global forest product markets (Latta et al, 2015;Forest2Market, 2019), (3) the heterogeneity of land owners and their behavior including responses to market signals via land management regime decisions (Håbesland et al, 2016;Sohngen and Mendelsohn, 2003), and (4) Policy interventions that can that affect land-based commodity markets and related land use decisions (e.g., bioenergy policies) (Guo et al, 2019;Wise et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%