2002
DOI: 10.1017/s1074070800009032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of Globalization on Agricultural Competitiveness: The Case of NAFTA

Abstract: Major components of agricultural competitiveness, including definitions, factors, and indicators of competitiveness, are discussed. The case of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is used to illustrate how factors have influenced the competitive position of the NAFTA countries. Traditional neoclassical trade theory is used to evaluate the impact of currency exchange rate fluctuations and trade preferences on agricultural competitiveness. Pre- and post-NAFTA market shares are evaluated for five agri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Welch and Lyford (2007, p. 66) cite Drescher and Maurer’s (1999) definition of competitiveness as the ability of firms and industries “[…] to protect and/or improve their position in relation to competitors which are active in the same market”. This definition is consistent with that of Sharples (1986) and Kennedy and Rosson (2002), who define competitiveness as the ability to achieve market share. The producer who attains a market share for its product is, by definition, competitive.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Welch and Lyford (2007, p. 66) cite Drescher and Maurer’s (1999) definition of competitiveness as the ability of firms and industries “[…] to protect and/or improve their position in relation to competitors which are active in the same market”. This definition is consistent with that of Sharples (1986) and Kennedy and Rosson (2002), who define competitiveness as the ability to achieve market share. The producer who attains a market share for its product is, by definition, competitive.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…We rely on several indicators to assess the competitiveness of the dairy sector across countries, namely, the revealed comparative advantage indicator ( RCA ; Fertö and Hubbard, ), the production of products (Kennedy and Parr Rosson, ), market share (Kennedy and Parr Rosson, ), trade balance (Korinek and Melatos, ) and farm‐gate price (Fertö and Hubbard, ). The RCA is a measure of comparative advantage, an indicator which is often used to measure competitiveness in sectors highly dependent on factor endowments, such as the agricultural sector.…”
Section: Free Trade Agreements and The Dairy Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RCA is a measure of comparative advantage, an indicator which is often used to measure competitiveness in sectors highly dependent on factor endowments, such as the agricultural sector. Comparative advantage is defined as the ‘relative opportunity cost differentials between countries’ (Kennedy and Parr Rosson, , p. 278). Even though the chosen indicators do not clearly capture how the underlying factors of firms are sources of competitiveness, they still allow for a comprehensive analysis of a given country's competitiveness in the dairy sector.…”
Section: Free Trade Agreements and The Dairy Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trend towards freer trade has increased the clarity of world price signals and international markets. This has resulted in increasing the importance of the comparative advantage within the framework (Kennedy and Rosson, 2002). Likewise, Abbott and Thompson (1987) point out that "a properly formulated theory of agricultural comparative advantage should provide a framework for evaluation of self-sufficiency policies and the agriculture versus industry debate".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%