Impacto Ambiental Em Assentamentos Da Reforma Agrária No Mato Grosso

Morais, Marco Antonio Vieira; Sousa, Roberto Antônio Ticle de Melo e; Costa, Reginaldo Brito da; Dorval, Alberto; Timofeiczyk, Romano

doi:10.5380/rf.v42i3.19462

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The scoring system is standardized between 0 and 1 and the system sustainability degree is given according to the reference value (0.7); if below, barely sustainable, if above the line, sustainable. However, Moraes et al (2012) highlight that the existence of a single reference line in APOIA Novo-Rural limits the environmental impact interpretation, as it stipulates a pre-defined environmental standard, which may not correspond to the minimum expected situation by the rural establishment. The result obtained by ISA follows the same approach mentioned above.…”

Section: Sustainability Conceptmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative analysis of sustainability assessment methods in agroecosystems

Santana¹,

Pedrotti²,

Holanda³

et al. 2021

Int J Innov Educ Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this work was to compare and analyze three different methods of the sustainability evaluation in agricultural systems, such as the Indicateurs de Durabilité des Exploitations Agricoles (IDEA), the weighted Assessment of environmental impact of New Rural activities (APOIA Novo-Rural), and the indicators of sustainability in Agroecosystem (ISA). Those methods were comparied by two criteria. The first one relates to the distribution of sustainability indicators into categories (Endogenous System Operation, Endogenous Resources, Exogenous Systems Operation, and Exogenous Resources) and elements (technical, socioeconomic, natural and cultural resources). The second one involves the conceptual approaches of each method towards the concept of sustainability, objective and target audience, adoption of the systemic approach, level of stakeholder’s participation, level of adequacy, and method flexibility in different realities. The indicators set of each method, although quantitatively different, consider the diversity of elements that involve the agricultural systems. The IDEA method concentrates its indicators on the Endogenous System Operation category, while the APOIA Novo-Rural and the ISA methods concentrate their indicators on the Endogenous Resources category. The IDEA method directs the assessment to the awareness of the environmental processes that surround the agricultural activity in the property. On the other hand, in the APOIA Novo-Rural and the ISA methods, the reflective practice is fostered from impacts on the environment, and can be improved by extension actions. The main difference presented among those methods is the integrative evaluation of the indicators as well as trade-offs involved.

show abstract

Section: Sustainability Conceptmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative analysis of sustainability assessment methods in agroecosystems

Santana¹,

Pedrotti²,

Holanda³

et al. 2021

Int J Innov Educ Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Araújo (2007), in turn, addresses sustainability in local development and states that the poor condition of roads makes it difficult to flow production and increases the isolation of communities from settlements in relation to urban ones. Morais et al (2012) evaluated the environmental impact on seven properties of two rural settlements in the state of Mato Grosso. They used the APOIA -Novo Rural System, which expresses the Environmental Impact Index (IIA) based on 62 indicators, on a scale between zero (worst situation) and one (better situation).…”

Section: Sustainability Inmentioning

confidence: 99%

Environmental impacts and infrastructure in Agrarian Reform settlements in Minas Gerais, Brazil

Durante

Rossetto

Nora

et al. 2020

SustDeb

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The existence of adequate infrastructure aims to meet the basic human needs, contributing to local development, poverty reduction and social inequalities. The aim of this article is to analyze the potential environmental impacts arising from infrastructure conditions in agrarian reform settlements in the State of Minas Gerais - Brazil. The methodology is based on the Leopold Matrix, which considers the environmental components: water pollution, soil degradation, land use and quality of life, in a sample of 1,270 lots. The variables analyzed were: water supply; sanitation; disposal of wastewater, dry waste, pesticide packaging and veterinary medicinal products; distribution of electricity and paving of public roads. The results indicate that the impacts are of greater negative potential in the Northern Mesoregion of Minas Gerais (70%), followed by Triângulo Mineiro/Alto Paranaíba (60%), proving the hypothesis that the incipience in infrastructure conditions results in a greater negative environmental impact.

show abstract

Impacto Ambiental Em Assentamentos Da Reforma Agrária No Mato Grosso

Cited by 2 publications

References 2 publications

Comparative analysis of sustainability assessment methods in agroecosystems

Comparative analysis of sustainability assessment methods in agroecosystems

Environmental impacts and infrastructure in Agrarian Reform settlements in Minas Gerais, Brazil

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About