2021
DOI: 10.1177/0022057421991859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacting Resilience of Black Students Through Critically Conscious Institutional Leadership and Policy

Abstract: The author develops a conceptual framework that defines characteristics of critically conscious institutions and proposes their effectiveness in the promotion and strengthening of resilience in black students. Black students’ development within an anti-black society is framed as a sustained and continuous adversity, and this article expands the critical consciousness conversation by shifting the focus from changes in student characteristics to institutional change, mirroring the shift in resilience literature … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(70 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, Ostrom (1996, 2009) and her social‐ecological systems (SES) framework join Holling (1973) as seminal resilience works. Ostrom's SES approach is especially well‐suited to sustainable development in recognising a greater intersectionality of individuals, institutions, and ecologies (e.g., Athayde & Silva‐Lugo, 2018; Henderson, 2021; Szaboova et al, 2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, Ostrom (1996, 2009) and her social‐ecological systems (SES) framework join Holling (1973) as seminal resilience works. Ostrom's SES approach is especially well‐suited to sustainable development in recognising a greater intersectionality of individuals, institutions, and ecologies (e.g., Athayde & Silva‐Lugo, 2018; Henderson, 2021; Szaboova et al, 2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…social-ecological systems (SES) add seminal resilience works. Ostrom's SES framework is especially wellsuited to sustainable development in recognising a complex intersectionality of individuals, institutions, and ecologies (e.g.,Athayde and Silva-Lugo 2018;Henderson 2021; Szabooya 2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%