2012
DOI: 10.1016/s0104-1843(12)50051-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact on Renal Function of Rosuvastatin Preload Prior to Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Chronic Statin Users

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…37 Our studies included newer studies that used lower volume of contrast media, which caused less tubular toxicities. [16][17][18][19][20]27 Therefore, our meta-analysis successfully reveals the benefit of statins for the prevention of CIAKI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…37 Our studies included newer studies that used lower volume of contrast media, which caused less tubular toxicities. [16][17][18][19][20]27 Therefore, our meta-analysis successfully reveals the benefit of statins for the prevention of CIAKI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Jo et al 22 Zhou et al 23 Wang et al 24 Xinwei et al 14 Toso et al 25 Country Ozhan et al 26 Acikel et al 28 Patti et al 18 de Oliveira et al 27 Quintavalle et al 19 Country Turkey Li et al 20 Han et al 16 Leoncini et al 16 Country Statins for prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury 5 rather than a fixed-effect model. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran's Q test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1) [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. Twenty-seven studies were reviewed in full text.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Studies Includedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of risk of bias assessment are presented in Figure S1 ( [28] Han et al [33] Jo et al [17] Leoncini et al [32] Li et al [29] Patti et al [26] Quintavalle et al [30] Toso et al [23] Özhan et al [ [27] Chen and Su [18] De Oliveira et al [28] Han et al [33] Jo et al [17] Li et al [29] Lu et al [25] Patti et al [26] Toso et al [23] Özhan et al [22] Han et al [33] Jo et al [17] Leoncini et al [32] Patti et al [26] Toso et al [23] Total (95% CI) Total events Heterogeneity: 2 = 0.00; 2 = 0.41, d.f. = 4 (P = 0.98); I 2 = 0% Test for overall effect: Z = 1.80 (P = 0.07) provided insufficient information on the sequence generation and allocation concealment process, because of which they had an unclear risk of selection bias.…”
Section: Risk Of Bias Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%