1997
DOI: 10.1007/s002689900339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact on Outcome of Additional Microvascular Anastomosis—Supercharge—on Colon Interposition for Esophageal Replacement: Comparative and Multivariate Analysis

Abstract: The impact on the outcome of an additional microvascular anastomosis--supercharge--on colon interposition for esophageal replacement was retrospectively evaluated by comparing it with colon interposition without supercharge. A series of 53 patients had undergone colon interposition for esophageal replacement at Kurume University Hospital from 1981 to 1996. The postoperative courses and the morbidity and mortality rates were compared between the 24 patients who underwent colon interposition without supercharge … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
64
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many surgeons recommend to associate this procedure to the substernal esophageal reconstruction [3][4][5][18][19][20][21][22]. Statistically our study has some bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Many surgeons recommend to associate this procedure to the substernal esophageal reconstruction [3][4][5][18][19][20][21][22]. Statistically our study has some bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Some other authors did not use the thoracic vessels for the hypervascularisation of the jejunum, but the external carotid artery and internal jugular vein by Carrel [28] or transverse cervical artery and the internal carotid vein [38,39] being taken. The latter vessels were preferred for the revascularisation of colonic graft too [40,41].…”
Section: Direct Revascularisation Of the Colonic Graft For Oesophageamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, we do it routinely in all patients undergoing a substernal colonic interposition. This associated procedure is recommended by many surgeons when using the substernal approach for esophageal reconstruction [34][35][36][37][38][39][40] . The cervical anastomotic leakage is the most common complication encountered in esophageal reconstruction.…”
Section: Choice Of Replacement Organsmentioning
confidence: 99%