Impact of visual typicality on the adoption of wearables

Abstract

With the recent influx of IT firms and big-name fashion brands into the wearables market, the visual design of wearables has become a crucial factor in consumer choices. However, little research exists on this topic. Drawing upon the literature of technology adoption and design aesthetics, this study examines how the visual typicality of wearables affects their adoption by consumers. More specifically, the research tests the impact of the consumer-perceived visual typicality of smartwatches on purchase intention through the psychological antecedents to wearable adoption (i.e., effort expectancy, performance expectancy, social influence, playfulness). The hypothesized relationships among the variables were tested in an online survey with 409 U.S. participants, where fictitious smartwatch designs were employed as the stimuli. In the results, perceived visual typicality of the smartwatch designs significantly decreased perceived performance and playfulness of the watch.Perceived visual typicality also had a negative impact on participants' purchase intention. Among the four psychological antecedents to wearable adoption, perceived playfulness played the most significant role in the relationship between the visual typicality and purchase intention. The moderation effect of gender was partially supported: Visual typicality significantly decreased purchase intention for females whereas it had no impact on the wearable adoption for males. | INTRODUCTIONThe term "wearables" was coined to encompass all wearable devices that involve technologies like electronics, software, data transmitters,

Value‐based adoption of augmented reality: A study on the influence on online purchase intention in retail

“…As reflected in the detailed description of the different ARSG devices used in the study (Appendix, Table A1), product differentiation of devices goes beyond technical functionality and perceived immersion, including accessories and design. Recent literature has shown that the perceived visual typicality of wearable technology, such as smartwatches, can negatively influence the perceived performance of the device and hence influences technology adoption (Lee, 2020). If ARSG becomes mainstream, this gives rise to further exploration of the effect of product differentiation with focus on design aspects using a sufficiently large set of different ARSG designs.…”

The Impact of Mobile Payment on Hedonic Preference

“…Both hedonic and utilitarian functions are important design features considered by the designers of smart wearable devices (Iftikhar, Shah, and Luximon 2019). To create a successful smart wearable device, designers need to satisfy consumers with both hedonic and utilitarian functions by increasing consumers’ performance and playfulness perceptions of the device (Kim 2017; Lee 2021). In the current research, we suggest that consumers may associate a hedonic mindset less with smart wearable devices than with mobile phones because the two kinds of devices have different primary functions.…”

How to survive in advertisement flooding: The effects of schema–product congruity and attribute relevance on advertisement attitude

“…Because peripheral messages mainly appeal to emotional value and express less beneficial attributes of the product, they are important in the context of emphasizing creativity and novelty (Lee & Colarelli O'Connor, 2003). However, advertising that simply emphasizes the typical product design without emphasizing any salient attributes can indicate a lack of innovation (Hagtvedt & Patrick, 2014; Lee, 2021). Therefore, if the attributes that cannot be directly inferred from product quality are presented with information that is congruous with consumers' schema, the representation of product categories is limited and will not be novel enough to attract attention.…”

“…Because peripheral messages mainly appeal to emotional value and express less beneficial attributes of the product, they are important in the context of emphasizing creativity and novelty (Lee & Colarelli O'Connor, 2003). However, advertising that simply emphasizes the typical product design without emphasizing any salient attributes can indicate a lack of innovation (Hagtvedt & Patrick, 2014;Lee, 2021).…”

“…Additionally, some studies have investigated the influences of novelty and typicality on esthetic preference (Hekkert et al, 2003). Based on previous studies that insist that novelty is the opposite of the typicality concept (Creusen & Schoormans, 2005; Lee, 2021), this study identified the mediating effects of both novelty and typicality on advertising attitude to verify the union of advertising elements.…”