2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.09.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of use of frozen section assessment of operative margins on survival in oral cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
54
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of frozen sections is in dispute because of discrepancies between the frozen section report and the final margin status and the difficulty of establishing a mutual understanding between surgeons and pathologists of the various pieces of information in a small segment of tissue 3,20 . Some reports have shown that adding intraoperative imprint cytology can be more useful than frozen sections alone for diagnostic accuracy 2,6 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of frozen sections is in dispute because of discrepancies between the frozen section report and the final margin status and the difficulty of establishing a mutual understanding between surgeons and pathologists of the various pieces of information in a small segment of tissue 3,20 . Some reports have shown that adding intraoperative imprint cytology can be more useful than frozen sections alone for diagnostic accuracy 2,6 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DiNardo et al (12) found this rate as 98.3% for 420 FSE from 80 patients having squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck region, but the reliability rate of 71.3% reported for near or positive surgical margin is a more remarkable finding of this study. Pathak et al (13) investigated oral cavity carcinomas in 416 patients in their series and they stated that FSE did not affect local recurrence and survival. In our literature review, only one study investigating the reliability of FSE in TOLL was found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Byers et al [11] found that the surgeon was able to obtain clear margins in 67 % cases only. Pathak et al [12] found that the accuracy rate of frozen in predicting clear margin status was 70.4 %, while the rate of clinical judgment was 67.4 % in achieving clear margins. Kerawala et al [13] reported an error of more than a centimeter in relocating possible site for revision of margin in 32 % of cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%