2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.01.036
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Ultrasound-Guided Transvaginal Ovarian Needle Drilling Versus Laparoscopic Ovarian Drilling on Ovarian Reserve and Pregnancy Rate in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are no randomized reports about clinical outcome, namely, pregnancy and live-birth rates. One study compared another drilling method that could not assess flat endometriotic lesions, i.e., ultrasound-guided transvaginal ovarian needle drilling, to standard LOD: Patients in the LOD group experienced a significantly lower AMH, lower antral follicular count, higher ovulation rate, and higher pregnancy rate after six months [41]. It seems reasonable that the lower chance of ovulation contributed widely to the lower pregnancy rate in the transvaginal ovarian needle-drilling group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are no randomized reports about clinical outcome, namely, pregnancy and live-birth rates. One study compared another drilling method that could not assess flat endometriotic lesions, i.e., ultrasound-guided transvaginal ovarian needle drilling, to standard LOD: Patients in the LOD group experienced a significantly lower AMH, lower antral follicular count, higher ovulation rate, and higher pregnancy rate after six months [41]. It seems reasonable that the lower chance of ovulation contributed widely to the lower pregnancy rate in the transvaginal ovarian needle-drilling group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 months after the procedures, the laparoscopic group proved to be more effective as the ovulation rates and pregnancy rates were significantly higher than those of the transvaginal route, but the fall in AMH was also more significant in the laparoscopic group. The group concluded that the vaginal route is less invasive and safe procedure, but its effect weans within 6 months and its effect on ovarian reserve is milder and transient [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…JMIG editors would like to notify the readers that concerns have been raised about the article, "Impact of Ultrasound-Guided Transvaginal Ovarian Needle Drilling Versus Laparoscopic Ovarian Drilling on Ovarian Reserve and Pregnancy Rate in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial" [1]. The editors have requested de-identified data in order to investigate.…”
Section: Expression Concernmentioning
confidence: 99%