2013
DOI: 10.1080/10618562.2013.867951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of turbulence modelling on external supersonic flow field simulations in rocket aerodynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…standard k À ε model) generally has difficulties to be able to predict the length of separation accurately. With the introduced compressibility modifications, the modified k À ε model preforms much better and even shows advantages to the k À u SST turbulence model which is widely used for separation flow predictions [37,38].…”
Section: Main Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…standard k À ε model) generally has difficulties to be able to predict the length of separation accurately. With the introduced compressibility modifications, the modified k À ε model preforms much better and even shows advantages to the k À u SST turbulence model which is widely used for separation flow predictions [37,38].…”
Section: Main Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this comparison and the grid independence study, the k-ω SST turbulence model was chosen for all subsequent simulations. This choice is also supported by the work of Medeiros et al (2012), López et al (2013) and Lee et al (2016), who concluded that the SST k – ω turbulence is the most suitable RANS model to simulate this type of flow.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The design process of a rocket with experimental processes and measuring all the necessary variables in wind tunnels can be exhausting, time and money consuming for most researchers [9]. A reasonable prediction of these parameters with the utilization of appropriate approaches is offered by CFD simulations.…”
Section: Utilization Of Cfd For Aerodynamic Design Of a Rocketmentioning
confidence: 99%