2011
DOI: 10.1109/tns.2011.2109966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of the Radial Ionization Profile on SEE Prediction for SOI Transistors and SRAMs Beyond the 32-nm Technological Node

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Electron-hole pair's depositions occurring close to the sensitive areas were modeled from the 3D morphology database as a function of the ion energy, type and incidence angle [25].…”
Section: Musca-sepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electron-hole pair's depositions occurring close to the sensitive areas were modeled from the 3D morphology database as a function of the ion energy, type and incidence angle [25].…”
Section: Musca-sepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17][18][19] For nuclear reactions, every reaction event can induce a unique energy deposition structure that is not radially symmetric with respect to the primary particle path. As shown in Fig.1, the products of different species and energies from different kinds of reaction channels induced by neutrons move in different directions and have their own tracks.…”
Section: Simulation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monte Carlo simulated ion track structures have been widely used for the study of Single-Event Effects in electronic components [1][2][3][4][5], in particular using the free open source Geant4 toolkit [6,7]. Recent studies have been confronted with the inherent limits of the Geant4 ionization models for application to very integrated technologies [2,4]: the recommended low energy limit applicability of 250 eV for the production of secondary electrons in the low energy electromagnetic package Livermore models [8] limits the accuracy of the heavy ion track below 10 nm [2], thus preventing the use of these models beyond the 45 nm node [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%