2013
DOI: 10.1080/09709274.2013.11906601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of the Land Redistribution for Agricultural Development (LRAD) Projects on Livelihoods of Beneficiaries in Ngaka Modiri Molema District, South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Households that benefited from land reform used land for various agricultural activities (e.g. crop, horticulture and livestock production), depending on prevailing agro-ecological conditions and resource availability (Bradstock 2005;Lahiff et al 2008;Antwi and Oladele 2013;Aliber and Cousins 2013). General introduction…”
Section: Land Ownership and Usementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Households that benefited from land reform used land for various agricultural activities (e.g. crop, horticulture and livestock production), depending on prevailing agro-ecological conditions and resource availability (Bradstock 2005;Lahiff et al 2008;Antwi and Oladele 2013;Aliber and Cousins 2013). General introduction…”
Section: Land Ownership and Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In South Africa, limited agricultural production on reformed land hampered the contribution of land reform to the livelihoods of beneficiaries (Lahiff and Li 2012;Aliber and Cousins 2013). To my knowledge, the livelihood impacts of land reform in South Africa have either been studied on farms within a single land reform subprogramme or, if subprogrammes were compared, only a limited number of farms were included within subprogrammes (Wegerif 2004;Bradstock 2005;Lahiff et al 2008;Valente 2011;Aliber and Cousins 2013;Antwi and Oladele 2013;Keswell and Carter 2014). Furthermore, the extent to which land reform farms contributed to livelihoods has not been quantified and factors underlying the households' economics have not been analysed.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations