2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2011.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of the hypomethylating agent 5-azacytidine on dendritic cells function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, recent evidence suggested that azacitidine can significantly impact some important immune functions via epigenetic modifications, making it an attractive candidate for pharmacologic manipulation of the immune system. 8 In the present study by Goodyear et al, the adjunctive administration of azacitidine after allo-SCT in a series of 27 AML patients was well tolerated despite the drug being started soon after allo-SCT. Of note, increased numbers of circulating Tregs were detected in patients who had received 3 courses of posttransplant azacitidine compared with a control group of patients studied at similar time points after transplantation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 49%
“…In addition, recent evidence suggested that azacitidine can significantly impact some important immune functions via epigenetic modifications, making it an attractive candidate for pharmacologic manipulation of the immune system. 8 In the present study by Goodyear et al, the adjunctive administration of azacitidine after allo-SCT in a series of 27 AML patients was well tolerated despite the drug being started soon after allo-SCT. Of note, increased numbers of circulating Tregs were detected in patients who had received 3 courses of posttransplant azacitidine compared with a control group of patients studied at similar time points after transplantation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 49%
“…AZA administration and toxicity AZA was administered for a median of three cycles (range, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12], at a dose of 75 mg/m 2 per day for 7 days every 4 weeks for the majority of the patients (92%). AZA dose was reduced to 60 mg/m 2 per day (two patients) for 7 days according to the attending physician because of fear of toxicity.…”
Section: Patient Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, different studies suggested an immunomodulatory effect of the drug. 9 AZA has been shown to increase the expression of tumor Ags by leukemic cells. [10][11][12][13] AZA can also increase regulatory T cells and CD8 þ tumor-specific T-cell responses both in vitro and in the human clinical setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hypothesis is supported by a recent study in which blasts from AML patients treated with a DNA hypomethylating agent 5-azacytidine generated DCs with improved cytokine profile and immunostimulatory activity. 44 We and others have shown that 5-azacytidine treatment successfully reexpresses methylationsilenced p15Ink4b in blasts isolated from AML patients and myeloid cell lines. 45,46 However, whereas the presented results in murine primary cells and our preliminary results with human AML-derived cell lines (supplemental Figure 4) support a potential clinical application for immunotherapy, a large experimental study with primary blasts isolated from AML patients with and without silenced (methylated) p15INK4b is required to validate this assumption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hypothesis is supported by a recent study in which blasts from AML patients treated with a DNA hypomethylating agent 5-azacytidine generated DCs with improved cytokine profile and immunostimulatory activity. 44 We and others have shown that 5-azacytidine treatment successfully reexpresses methylationsilenced p15Ink4b in blasts isolated from AML patients and (A) Cell lysates from RAW264.7 cells expressing empty vector (Mig0) or p15Ink4b (MigDDp15) and treated with LPS (1 g/mL) for the indicated periods were analyzed by Western blot with Abs against the indicated phosphorylated IB␣ (Ser-32) or NF-Bp65 (Ser536) and the total IB␣, NFBp65, and PU.1 (Cell Signaling Technology) proteins. The representative results shown are from the same blot that was stripped and reprobed with anti-actin.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%