2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2016.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of the high-frequency cutoff of bandpass filtering on ECG quality and clinical interpretation: A comparison between 40Hz and 150Hz cutoff in a surgical preoperative adult outpatient population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior to CS encoding, the ECG signals were filtered by 4-pole Butterworth high-pass and low-pass filters. The filters' cutoff frequencies are 0.5 Hz and 40 Hz, respectively, as specified for ambulatory ECG monitoring [51], [52]. Due to their impact on minimizing the CS encoder complexity, we selected RSBM with d = 12 and RD sensing matrices for CS encoding in our experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to CS encoding, the ECG signals were filtered by 4-pole Butterworth high-pass and low-pass filters. The filters' cutoff frequencies are 0.5 Hz and 40 Hz, respectively, as specified for ambulatory ECG monitoring [51], [52]. Due to their impact on minimizing the CS encoder complexity, we selected RSBM with d = 12 and RD sensing matrices for CS encoding in our experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Band-pass filtering is widely used in ECG signal processing for eliminating high-frequency noise and performs well in R-peak detection. Regarding two commonly used cutoff frequencies (i.e., 40 and 150 Hz) in low-pass filtering of ECGs, 40 Hz could effectively eliminate the high-frequency noises but lead to the elevation of J-point, i.e., the junction between QRS termination and ST-segment onset ( Nakagawa et al, 2014 ; Christov et al, 2017 ), resulting in inaccuracy of the onset of the ST segment, whereas 150 Hz could overcome this problem but cause a high level of residual noise ( Ricciardi et al, 2016 ; Christov et al, 2017 ). As compared with a band-pass filter, the discrete wavelet transform could perform better in terms of eliminating high-frequency noise and keeping the morphology feature points of the ECG signal ( Addison, 2005 ; Singh and Pradhan, 2018 ; Chen et al, 2020 ), as illustrated in Supplementary Figure S1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recording used the commercial acquisition system (iWorx, model RA834, iWorx Systems Inc, Dover, NH, USA) and ECG devices (iWire-BIO4, iWorx Systems Inc, Dover, New Hampshire, US). The sampling frequency was 1 kHz and the analog filter for the ECG was 0.05-40 Hz [29].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%