2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0734-743x(00)00063-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of the 7.62-mm APM2 projectile against the edge of a metallic target

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerical simulation of perforation by application of RK and JC models Impact perforation of steel plates was widely studied in the last decades due to the applications necessary in sev eral engineering fields like aeronautics, automotive or mil itary industries (Borvik et al, 1999;2002a,b;Gupta et al, 2006Gupta et al, , 2007Arias et al, 2008;Rusinek et al, 2008bRusinek et al, , 2008cTeng et al, in press;Piekutowski, 2001;Chocron et al, 2001;Forrestal and Piekutowski, 2000;Dey et al, 2004;Børvik et al, 2005;Chocron et al, 2006;Teng and Wierzbicki, 2006;Voyiadjis and Abu Al Rub, 2006;Rodríguez Martínez et al, 2008). Several works can be found in the international literature dealing with differ ent aspects of the perforation processes, for example, pro jectile geometry (Borvik et al, 2002a,b;Gupta et al, 2006Gupta et al, , 2007Arias et al, 2008;Rusinek et al, 2008b), target thick ness, (Borvik et al, 2003), constitutive relation (Rusinek et al, 2008c), failure criterion (Teng and Wierzbicki, 2006), or material optimization, (Dey et al, 2004).…”
Section: Comparison Between Rk Pb and Jc Constitutive Relations For mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical simulation of perforation by application of RK and JC models Impact perforation of steel plates was widely studied in the last decades due to the applications necessary in sev eral engineering fields like aeronautics, automotive or mil itary industries (Borvik et al, 1999;2002a,b;Gupta et al, 2006Gupta et al, , 2007Arias et al, 2008;Rusinek et al, 2008bRusinek et al, , 2008cTeng et al, in press;Piekutowski, 2001;Chocron et al, 2001;Forrestal and Piekutowski, 2000;Dey et al, 2004;Børvik et al, 2005;Chocron et al, 2006;Teng and Wierzbicki, 2006;Voyiadjis and Abu Al Rub, 2006;Rodríguez Martínez et al, 2008). Several works can be found in the international literature dealing with differ ent aspects of the perforation processes, for example, pro jectile geometry (Borvik et al, 2002a,b;Gupta et al, 2006Gupta et al, , 2007Arias et al, 2008;Rusinek et al, 2008b), target thick ness, (Borvik et al, 2003), constitutive relation (Rusinek et al, 2008c), failure criterion (Teng and Wierzbicki, 2006), or material optimization, (Dey et al, 2004).…”
Section: Comparison Between Rk Pb and Jc Constitutive Relations For mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption prevents the energy absorption by the projectile during penetration. In several works [44,45] the projectile behaviour is commonly defined as simply elastic or elastic perfectly plastic without using a failure criterion. In present case, the definition of rigid body changes the numerical predictions concerning the residual velocity.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first numerical study authors are aware of was carried out by Chocron et al [12]. In this study, impact of 7.62 mm AP ammunition against edge of a metallic target was investigated to explain the defeating mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%