2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03853.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of the 2005 smoke‐free policy in Italy on prevalence, cessation and intensity of smoking in the overall population and by educational group

Abstract: The impact of the Italian smoke-free policy on smoking and inequalities in smoking was short-term. Smoke-free policies may not achieve the secondary effect of reducing smoking prevalence in the long term, and they may have limited effects on inequalities in smoking.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
30
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
30
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are broadly consistent with those of other studies that have assessed the influence of smoke-free laws, [22][23][24] although studies from some countries have revealed no change, 24,25 perhaps because of data limitations or a differing rate of incremental policy change. Smoke-free policies result in fewer opportunities to smoke and send a clear message about the declining social acceptability of smoking.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Our findings are broadly consistent with those of other studies that have assessed the influence of smoke-free laws, [22][23][24] although studies from some countries have revealed no change, 24,25 perhaps because of data limitations or a differing rate of incremental policy change. Smoke-free policies result in fewer opportunities to smoke and send a clear message about the declining social acceptability of smoking.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In addition, using data from a survey conducted after the 2004 CIAL in Ireland, Anonymous (2005) found that, among Irish smokers who quit after the law came into force, 80% not only reported that the law had helped them to quit but, of these, 88% stated that it had helped them to remain non-smokers 1 . Gallus et al (2006) Federico et al (2012), with a special focus on the role of education. These results are also in line with findings from studies analysing countries outside Europe (e.g., the US, Australia and Canada; Fichtenberg & Glantz (2004)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Public support for the ban was widespread and enforcement was considered successful Gorini 2011). The existing empirical evidence strongly supports a negative short-run effect of the public smoking ban on both smoking prevalence and total consumption of cigarettes (Buonanno and Ranzani, 2013;Cesaroni et al, 2008;Federico et al, 2012;Gallus et al, 2007). However this evidence is mainly based on before-after comparisons without a valid control group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although some of this evidence is based on relatively small samples (e.g., the survey used in has about 3,100 individuals), two recent studies by Federico et al (2012) and Buonanno and Ranzani (2013) based on data from large national surveys also report statistically significant effects of the ban on individual smoking behaviour. Federico et al (2012) analyse 11 waves from the Multiscopo Survey (conducted by ISTAT, the Italian Office of National Statistics, with a sample size of about 30,000 observations for each year), from 1999 to 2010 and show evidence of a decrease in smoking prevalence for men (2.6%) as well as an increase in quit rates for both men (3.3%) and women (4.5%) in the year immediately after the introduction of the ban.…”
Section: The 2005 Ban On Smoking In Public Places In Italymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation