2004
DOI: 10.1021/es035311z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of the 2002 Canadian Forest Fires on Particulate Matter Air Quality in Baltimore City

Abstract: With increasing evidence of adverse health effects associated with particulate matter (PM), the exposure impact of natural sources, such as forest fires, has substantial public health relevance. In addition to the threat to nearby communities, pollutants released from forest fires can travel thousands of kilometers to heavily populated urban areas. There was a dramatic increase in forest fire activity in the province of Quebec, Canada, during July 2002. The transport of PM released from these forest fires was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

5
149
2
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 240 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
149
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Forest fires are known to be a major source of air pollutants [1] on a local and a global scale [2][3][4][5][6]. Each year, combustion products from local and distant wildfires impact large populations worldwide [5,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Forest fires are known to be a major source of air pollutants [1] on a local and a global scale [2][3][4][5][6]. Each year, combustion products from local and distant wildfires impact large populations worldwide [5,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each year, combustion products from local and distant wildfires impact large populations worldwide [5,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. The atmospheric pollutant that most consistently increases with biomass smoke from wildfires is suspended fine particulate matter (PM), which is commonly associated with increased mortality and morbidity [1,4,[14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations