2019
DOI: 10.1080/19368623.2019.1653806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Tangible and Intangible Restaurant Attributes on Overall Experience: A Consumer Oriented Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the prices of food in restaurants should be in line with the balance of quality (Jin et al, 2012). The reasonable prices have been accepted as a significant component of restaurant experience for visitors (Karamustafa & Ülker, 2019). Our findings confirm this.…”
Section: Economic Valuesupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the prices of food in restaurants should be in line with the balance of quality (Jin et al, 2012). The reasonable prices have been accepted as a significant component of restaurant experience for visitors (Karamustafa & Ülker, 2019). Our findings confirm this.…”
Section: Economic Valuesupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Furthermore, travellers spend a significant amount of their overall budget for food (Vu et al, 2019). In this respect, restaurants are playing an important supportive role for travellers through offering not only food and beverages but also enjoyable and memorable experiences (Karamustafa & Ülker, 2019) which customers may easily share on social media platforms (Nemeschansky, 2020). The literature indicates that the dining experience of customers has a close relationship with restaurant attributes which are affecting customers' satisfaction and future behavioural intentions (Kwun & Oh, 2006;Chen & Hu, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies show that behavioral intentions refer to positive word of mouth resulting in recommendations, remaining loyal and revisits (Shahzadi et al , 2018; Jani and Han, 2011). Following the early work of Berry et al (2002) on how to manage service experience with food quality (functional clue), SQ (humanic clue) and atmosphere (mechanic clue) as key attributes, revisits have been discussed extensively in the foodservice context (Karamustafa and Ülker, 2020; Nguyen et al , 2018; Bujisic et al , 2014; Ryu et al , 2012). Satisfaction and behavioral intentions are often used as dependent variables and in this context, previous research underlined the mediating role of satisfaction for customers' intentions (Barber et al , 2011; Lee and Whaley, 2019).…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It consists of five dimensions to measure SQ: reliability, responsiveness, empathy, tangibles and assurance. Currently, these five dimensions still play an essential role in explaining SQ (Karamustafa and Ülker, 2020; Bilgihan et al , 2018; Liu and Tse, 2018).…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(the core product) is actually delivered to the guest. It includes excellence, error-free, and promptness.Heung et al (2002), Chang et al (2011), Ryu et al (2012), Alonso et al (2013), Chi et al (2013), Kim (2014), Björk & Kauppinen-Räisänen, (2017), Seyfi et al (2020)SEAService Employee AttributesThe attributes (appearance, dress, & abilities) of restaurant staff during "moments of truth" Heung et al (2002),Correia et al (2008),Meng et al (2008),Karim & Chi (2010),Chi et al (2013),Ryu et al (2012),Sthapit (2017),Kala (2020),Karamustafa & Ülker (2020). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%