Impact of sulfur application on soybean yield and quality in New York

Letham, Jodi L.; Ketterings, Quirine M.; Cherney, J. H.; Overton, T.R.

doi:10.1002/agj2.20690

Cited by 8 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These responses are consistent with previous studies that did not observe consistent responses to S additions (Borja Reis et al, 2021;Cannon et al, 2021;Letham et al, 2021;Moro Rosso et al, 2020;Roysdon, 2021). Although yield increases with fertilizer treatment were seen, no treatment was consistently higher than the control (Table 4).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

“…Despite these facts, most research has concluded that S is not currently limiting in U.S. soybean production systems (Borja Reis et al., 2021; Cannon et al., 2021; Letham et al., 2021; Moro Rosso et al., 2020; Roysdon, 2021). To further complicate S recommendations, S soil levels have not been shown to be a good indicator of S deficiency (Letham et al., 2021), rather, plant tissue analysis is argued to be the best detector of S deficiency (Divito et al., 2015; Hitsuda et al., 2008). Other studies have argued that grain S content is the best indicator for S fertility (Hitsuda et al., 2008).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Soybean yield response to sulfur and nitrogen additions across diverse U.S. environments

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] yields reach record highs, more nutrients are required to maintain these production levels. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of S and N on soybean yield in diverse environments across the United States. Data were collected from a total of 52 sites in 10 states over 2 yr (2019 and 2020) for this study. A factorial arrangement of three S rates (11, 22, and 33 kg S ha −1 ) using two sources (ammonium sulfate [AMS] and calcium sulfate [CaSO 4 ]) were broadcasted by hand at planting. Additionally, to examine the impact of N on soybean yield, urea was applied at 10, 20, and 29 kg N ha −1 to equal that supplied by AMS. A zero-fertilizer control treatment was also included. Soil samples prior to fertilization as well as grain yield at R8 were collected and analyzed to understand what environmental conditions favor soybean response to S additions. Results

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Soybean yield response to sulfur and nitrogen additions across diverse U.S. environments

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The impact of S application (168 kg S ha -1 ) on soybean yield and crude protein was studied. Adding S did not alter the CP of soy seed; however, the S contents were slightly higher (Letham et al, 2021).…”

Section: Hybridization Breedingmentioning

confidence: 74%

Role of conventional and molecular techniques in soybean yield and quality improvement: A critical review

Gai

Rasheed²,

Zhou

et al. 2021

Not Bot Horti Agrobo

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The soybean is one of the most significant legume crops around the globe and serves as a source of dietary components for humans and animals. It has a higher percentage of protein compared to any other crop. Soybean yield and quality have been affected by many environmental factors. The genetic mechanism of yield and quality is still not clearly understood. Hence there is still a need to investigate the major potent factors to shed light on the mechanism behind yield and quality traits in soybean. Recently, a lot of significant work, including novel QTL, genes, and CRISPR-based genome editing in soybeans, has been done, which opened new doors of hope. The current review has presented detailed work done previously. We have also discussed the role of different breeding techniques in the conventional way of soybean improvement. The genetic factors regulating yield, quality, and disease resistance could be further cloned and transferred into elite cultivars to attain higher output in the current situation of changing environment. The integrated use of several techniques, like CRISPR/Cas9, next-generation sequencing, omics approaches, would be a fruitful way to improve soybean yield and quality. Besides this, hybridization, mass selection, pure line selection, backcross breeding, and pedigree selection should be adopted to develop novel soybean cultivars. This review concluded that soybean yield and quality improvement could be enhanced by exploring its genetic mechanism using several molecular and conventional methods.

show abstract

“…However, there was no significant yield response to S in this study. Others have shown that plants receive S from the atmospheric deposit and soil depths deeper than 45 cm (Matheny & Hunt, 1981; Putman et al., 2021). If the plants receiving no S fertilizer obtained S from sources not described in this study, it was not reflected in the leaf S concentration (Figure 1C).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Soybean response to potassium, magnesium, and sulfur fertilization on Southeastern Coastal Plain soils

Erhunmwunse

Farmaha

2023

Agrosystems Geosci & Env

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Potassium (K), magnesium (Mg), and sulfur (S) are susceptible to leaching in Southeastern Coastal Plain soils and can limit crop production if not properly managed. This study aimed to determine the effect of K, Mg, and S fertilization on soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] yield, tissue nutrient concentrations, and soil K, Mg, and S concentrations. Treatments included three K, two Mg, and two S fertilizer rates arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replications. There was no significant main or interaction effect of K, Mg, and S on soybean yield, even when the initial soil‐test S level was below critical levels. Leaf K concentrations of control plots measured at the R2 growth stage were in the sufficiency range reported for soybean in southeastern states. However, leaf Mg and S concentrations were below the sufficiency ranges. Applying S fertilizer increased leaf Mg and S concentrations, but Mg fertilizer did not affect leaf Mg concentrations. Applying K fertilizer rates increased soil‐test K across three soil depths compared to the control K treatment. The application of Mg fertilizer increased soil‐test Mg more at 0–15 cm than at the other two depths (15–30 or 30–45 cm), whereas S fertilizer application increased soil‐test S more at 15–30 cm. The soil samples taken before experiment initiation showed that the lower two soil depths had greater soil‐test K and S concentrations than at the top layer. These findings indicate that more research is needed to appropriately credit subsoil nutrients while making fertilizer recommendations for soybean grown on Southeastern Coastal Plain soils.

show abstract

Impact of sulfur application on soybean yield and quality in New York

Cited by 8 publications

References 28 publications

Soybean yield response to sulfur and nitrogen additions across diverse U.S. environments

Soybean yield response to sulfur and nitrogen additions across diverse U.S. environments

Role of conventional and molecular techniques in soybean yield and quality improvement: A critical review

Soybean response to potassium, magnesium, and sulfur fertilization on Southeastern Coastal Plain soils

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About