2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of solids retention time on dissolved organic nitrogen and its biodegradability in treated wastewater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the SRT of 8.2 d (aerobic SRT of 5.1 d) used to operate the high F:M reactors is common in activated sludge processes performing complete nitrification [28,67], and well above the operating SRT of 5-6 d at the full-scale plant that provided the sludge inoculum for this study. SRT values of 4-8 d have been suggested as optimum for nitrification in practice [67,68], while complete nitrification has been reported for SRT values as low as 2 d [69]. Thus, our observed changes in nitrifiers and nitrification function were driven by controlled changes in F:M and C:N values and not by washout of NOB due to a low SRT.…”
Section: /12supporting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the SRT of 8.2 d (aerobic SRT of 5.1 d) used to operate the high F:M reactors is common in activated sludge processes performing complete nitrification [28,67], and well above the operating SRT of 5-6 d at the full-scale plant that provided the sludge inoculum for this study. SRT values of 4-8 d have been suggested as optimum for nitrification in practice [67,68], while complete nitrification has been reported for SRT values as low as 2 d [69]. Thus, our observed changes in nitrifiers and nitrification function were driven by controlled changes in F:M and C:N values and not by washout of NOB due to a low SRT.…”
Section: /12supporting
confidence: 49%
“…The C:N values in this study were not controlled. This seems to be common practice as several recent studies, using sludge bioreactors to test the effect of varying SRT on nitrification and nitrifiers, neither controlled covariations in F:M nor accounted for changing C:N values [69,[72][73][74]. One of the studies, however, highlighted the importance of F:M covariations with SRT for assessing P removal [72].…”
Section: Importance Of Assessing F:m C:n and Srt Simultaneously For mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, findings about longer SRTs contributing to less amounts of DON have been reported in municipal biological nutrient removal (BNR) WWTPs (Sattayatewa et al, 2010). Interestingly, recent research conducted by Simsek et al (2016) Fig. 2).…”
Section: Chemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 93%
“…3, reaction 8) in the so called ammonification or mineralization reactions (Simsek et al, 2016). Thereafter, the NH 4 + generated can be removed from surface water as above described.…”
Section: Nitrogen Removal Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%