2009
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdp015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of socioeconomic, behavioral and clinical risk factors on mortality

Abstract: This study investigates the relative contributions of socioeconomic status (SES), behavioral and clinical risk factors on mortality. The Third National Health and Nutrition Survey Linked Mortality File was used to examine the association of SES (race, insurance, education, income), behavioral (smoking, obesity, physical activity), and clinical (elevated blood pressure, triglyceride level, lipid levels, C-reactive protein (CRP)) risk factors with 6-12-year all-cause mortality. Respondents were stratified by kno… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
22
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with prior studies conducted in the NHANES III cohort (Suresh et al, 2011; Rask et al, 2009; Sabanayagam and Shankar, 2012), we found strong and statistically significant associations between low socioeconomic status and increased mortality in the overall study population. Indeed, individuals in the lowest income group were 1.8 times as likely to die within the follow-up period compared to those in the highest income group and individuals with at most a high school education were approximately 1.3 times as likely to die within the follow-up period compared to those who had attained more than a high school education.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Consistent with prior studies conducted in the NHANES III cohort (Suresh et al, 2011; Rask et al, 2009; Sabanayagam and Shankar, 2012), we found strong and statistically significant associations between low socioeconomic status and increased mortality in the overall study population. Indeed, individuals in the lowest income group were 1.8 times as likely to die within the follow-up period compared to those in the highest income group and individuals with at most a high school education were approximately 1.3 times as likely to die within the follow-up period compared to those who had attained more than a high school education.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, research on factors other than demographics suggests that socioeconomic conditions may have a profound effect on risk of mortality, both in the general population and after SCI. [3][4][5] This research has typically focused on education and income to the exclusion of gainful employment as a risk factor for mortality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 These studies demonstrated the importance of income and education but did not address gainful employment. Studies in the general population have rarely addressed employment, [3][4][5] as employment is fundamental to adult life and employment rates are typically high. However, given the low employment rates and the relationship of poor employment outcomes with policy factors (particularly work disincentives in the USA), employment may be a critical, yet overlooked, risk factor for mortality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of premature deaths are highly important and they should be analyzed in 3 aspects: macrosocial, mezosocial and in the perspective of a particular individual. [110]. It should be stressed that depression appeared to be a predictive mortality factor, especially in elderly people.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%