2012
DOI: 10.1063/1.4749823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of resonator geometry and its coupling with ground plane on ultrathin metamaterial perfect absorbers

Abstract: We investigate the impact of resonator geometry and its coupling with ground plane on the performance of metamaterial perfect absorbers. Using a cross-resonator as an example structure, we find that the absorber thickness can be further reduced through modifying the geometric dimensions of the resonators. Numerical simulations and theoretical calculations reveal that destructive interference of multiple reflections is responsible for the near-unity absorption. The near-field coupling between the resonator arra… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
91
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1, we assume that layer 1 is considered as a surface with zero thickness. S 11 = |S 11 |e jθ 11 is the reflection coefficient of layer 1 from area 1 to area 1, S 21 = |S 21 |e jθ 21 is the transmission coefficient of layer 1 from area 1 to area 2, S 12 = |S 12 |e jθ 12 is the transmission coefficient of layer 1 from area 2 to area 1, and S 22 = |S 22 |e jθ 22 is the reflection coefficient of layer 1 from area 2 to area 2. According to the interference theory 23 and due to the …”
Section: Extended Interference Theory Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1, we assume that layer 1 is considered as a surface with zero thickness. S 11 = |S 11 |e jθ 11 is the reflection coefficient of layer 1 from area 1 to area 1, S 21 = |S 21 |e jθ 21 is the transmission coefficient of layer 1 from area 1 to area 2, S 12 = |S 12 |e jθ 12 is the transmission coefficient of layer 1 from area 2 to area 1, and S 22 = |S 22 |e jθ 22 is the reflection coefficient of layer 1 from area 2 to area 2. According to the interference theory 23 and due to the …”
Section: Extended Interference Theory Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the interference theory, or multiple reflection theory, is not a new theory and has been studied in EM wave, 17 Microwave Engineering, 18 optics 19 and a kind of absorbance body named Salisbury Screen, 20 of which the configuration is similar with MMA, it still has some differences, namely the interference theory exhibits advantage for studying the MMA through quite-correct quantitative analysis. Until now, however, only normal incidence condition was analyzed for MMAs in previous literatures 16,21,22 and little attention paid on the oblique incidence conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a typical single-metamaterial absorber structure, composed of an upper metal pattern layer, intermediate medium layer with thickness d and a bottom metal plane. A similar cross-shaped structure has been developed and applied to many analyses of MMAs [29][30][31], which has certain representativeness, so this structure is used in this paper. The EM wave is radiated to the surface of the MMA slab.…”
Section: Extended Reflection Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The power dissipated in the proposed electromagnetic metamaterial absorber can be achieved under three conditions: dielectric energy loss, magnetic energy loss from the substrate, and ohmic energy loss from the metal [107], [117], [118]. The absorption is from dielectric energy losses occurred while the nonmagnetic materials like FR4 are used as the substrate.…”
Section: The Incident Energy and Power Dissipationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they did not investigate the physical and dielectric properties of their device. Huang et al [107], Alves et al [108], and Landy et al [62] presented a single band device with high absorption, with a polarization insensitivity study that includes design, fabrication, and measurements. There is still a lack of investigation in the dual-band or multi-band metamaterial absorbers.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%