2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2010.07.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of regulation on the performances of long-distance transport services: A comparison of the different approaches in Sweden and Norway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, a similar condition occured in some other countries. Collaborations between companies had become more prevalent in the Norwegian market, whereas consolidation was much more prevalent due to the cost advantages in British and Swedish markets (White & Robbins, 2012;Leiren & Fearnley, 2008;Alexandersson et al, 2010;Aarhaug & Fearnley, 2016).…”
Section: Increasing Consolidation and Collaborationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, a similar condition occured in some other countries. Collaborations between companies had become more prevalent in the Norwegian market, whereas consolidation was much more prevalent due to the cost advantages in British and Swedish markets (White & Robbins, 2012;Leiren & Fearnley, 2008;Alexandersson et al, 2010;Aarhaug & Fearnley, 2016).…”
Section: Increasing Consolidation and Collaborationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The National Competition Authority of Sweden was not very fond of collaborations. However, the government of Norway supported collaborations due to increased intermodal competition and efficiency despite the opposition of the National Competition Authority (Alexandersson et al, 2010;Aarhaug & Fearnley, 2016).…”
Section: Increasing Consolidation and Collaborationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Studies also showed that public transport usage has, on the whole, increased on the corridors with train/coach competition. In total, ridership has more than doubled between 2002 and 2007, while productivity has reached levels significantly higher than in neighbouring Sweden, that has also deregulated its market but with less possibility for co-operation between operators (Alexandersson et al 2009). …”
Section: Norwaymentioning
confidence: 99%