2016
DOI: 10.1127/metz/2015/0574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Radar Data Assimilation on the Numerical Simulation of a Severe Storm in Croatia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, the assimilation of ground radar reflectivity and radial velocity with the three-dimensional variational (3D-Var) method provides good results in terms of a quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF) for several case studies in the United States and Korea (Xiao and Sun, 2007;Lee et al, 2010;Ha et al, 2011). In addition, the assimilation of radar data with 3D-Var confirms positive results in Europe using the Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS) and Application of Research to Operations at Mesoscale (AROME) models for two heavy rainfall cases in Croatia (Stanešić and Brewster, 2016) and France (Caumont et al, 2009) as well as using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model for the simulation of a convective event (Schwitalla and Wulfmeyer, 2014) during the Convective and Orographically induced Precipitation Study (COPS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…More specifically, the assimilation of ground radar reflectivity and radial velocity with the three-dimensional variational (3D-Var) method provides good results in terms of a quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF) for several case studies in the United States and Korea (Xiao and Sun, 2007;Lee et al, 2010;Ha et al, 2011). In addition, the assimilation of radar data with 3D-Var confirms positive results in Europe using the Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS) and Application of Research to Operations at Mesoscale (AROME) models for two heavy rainfall cases in Croatia (Stanešić and Brewster, 2016) and France (Caumont et al, 2009) as well as using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model for the simulation of a convective event (Schwitalla and Wulfmeyer, 2014) during the Convective and Orographically induced Precipitation Study (COPS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…They demonstrated that the 3D‐Var system improved the analysis field and the performance in terms of SQPF. Stanešić and Brewster () assimilated SYNOP data and radial velocity and reflectivity data from the Bilogora radar in Croatia using the 3D‐Var method assimilated into the Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS) high‐resolution model for the simulation of a storm in northwest Croatia. They showed that the assimilation of radar data and conventional observations improved the localization and estimation of precipitation of the thunderstorm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where N D and N V are respectively dry and water vapor terms of gaseous characteristics combined in Equation (2), N L refers to suspended liquid water droplets and N R is rain approximation. The contribution of water droplets to the refractivity is modeled from WRF model variables.…”
Section: Appendix B Modeling Of Cloud and Rain Effect On Tropospherimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weather monitoring and particularly nowcasting is currently based on two major data sources: rapid update weather forecast [1,2] and weather radars [3,4], providing information about current weather and short term forecasts. However, weather radars are very expensive and observations may be affected by several errors such as echo lines, topography, canopy and building shadowing effects as well as rain bands reduction [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%