Impact of pulmonary rehabilitation in sleep in COPD patients measured by actigraphy

Abstract

Introduction Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients have poor sleep quality, longer time to sleep onset and frequent nocturnal awakenings. Poor sleep quality in COPD is associated with poor quality of life (QoL), increased exacerbations and increased mortality. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) improves functional status and QoL in COPD but effects on sleep are unclear. PR improves subjective sleep quality but there is paucity of objective actigraphy data. We hypothesized that actigraphy would demonstrate subjective and objective improvement in sleep following PR. Paired comparisons (t-test or Wilcoxon-signed-rank test) were performed before and after PR data on all variables. Methods This retrospective study of COPD patients undergoing PR utilized actigraphy watch recordings before and after 8-weeks of PR to assess changes in sleep variables including total time in bed (TBT), total sleep time (TST), sleep onset latency (SOL), sleep efficiency (SE), wakefulness after sleep onset (WASO) and total nocturnal awakenings. A change in Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was a secondary outcome. PSQI was performed before and after PR. Results Sixty-nine patients were included in the final analysis. Most participants were male (97%), non-obese (median BMI 27.5, IQR 24.3 to 32.4 kg/m2) with an average age of 69 ± 8 years and 71% had severe COPD (GOLD stage 3 or 4). Prevalence of poor sleep quality (PSQI ≥5) was 86%. Paired comparisons did not show improvement in actigraphic sleep parameters following 8-weeks PR despite improvements in 6-min-walk distance (6MWD, mean improvement 54 m, 95% CI 34 m to 74 m, p<0.0001) and St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire scores (SGRQ, mean improvement 7.7 points, 95% CI 5.2 to 10.2, p<0.0001). Stratified analysis of all sleep variables by severity of COPD, BMI, mood, mental status, 6-MWD and SGRQ did not show significant improvement after PR. In Veterans with poor sleep quality (PSQI ≥ 5), PR improved subjective sleep quality (PSQI, mean difference 0.79, 95% CI 0.07 to 1.40, p = 0.03). Conclusions Pulmonary rehabilitation improved subjective sleep quality in Veterans who had poor sleep quality at the beginning of the PR but did not improve objective sleep parameters by actigraphy. Our findings highlight the complex interactions among COPD, sleep and exercise.

Subjective Sleep Quality in Quitters Versus Nonquitters on a Tobacco Smoking Cessation Program

“…A previous study showed that poorer sleep quality (as measured by PSQI) during the month prior to a scheduled quit attempt led to a greater likelihood of non-abstinence 1 and 3 months after cessation (18). Better subjective sleep quality in the last visit compared to baseline visit in quitters may stem from several factors including improvement in pulmonary (19). Accordingly, it may be suggested that quitting smoking improved pulmonary function which led to a better sleep quality in our study.…”

Sleep Quality and Self-Reported Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression Are Associated with Physical Activity in Patients with Severe COPD

“…There is only modest documentation on symptoms of sleep disturbances in patients with COPD and it is on top of that an overlooked phenomenon in the treatment of COPD [ 52 ]. Furthermore, OSA and poor sleep are commonly experienced symptoms in patients with COPD [ 53 ].…”

Improving Physiological, Physical, and Psychological Health Outcomes: A Narrative Review in US Veterans with COPD

“…A recent retrospective study examined subjective and objective sleep changes after eight weeks of conventional, in-person, structured PR and 12 months of an unstructured exercise program. 88 Despite sustained improvements in exercise capacity (measured via the 6MWT distance; mean improvement 68.8 m) and dyspnea (measured via the mMRC; mean difference −0.4 points), neither subjective sleep (measured via the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index) nor objective sleep (measured via actigraphy) improved. 88 …”

“… 88 Despite sustained improvements in exercise capacity (measured via the 6MWT distance; mean improvement 68.8 m) and dyspnea (measured via the mMRC; mean difference −0.4 points), neither subjective sleep (measured via the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index) nor objective sleep (measured via actigraphy) improved. 88 …”