2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of protein pulse feeding on lean mass in malnourished and at-risk hospitalized elderly patients: A randomized controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
100
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
100
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Methodological differences and limitations aside, these short-term studies quantify acute effects on protein anabolism that remain to be translated into gains of lean mass or function. One longer term study of 42 days was performed in malnourished hospitalized elderly persons consuming on average 1.3 g/(kg·day) either as a pulse feeding pattern, with >70% of protein provided at lunch, or spread into 4 meals (Bouillanne et al 2013). Significant gains in body cell mass and lean mass, but not handgrip strength, were found only in the pulse-fed group.…”
Section: Protein Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methodological differences and limitations aside, these short-term studies quantify acute effects on protein anabolism that remain to be translated into gains of lean mass or function. One longer term study of 42 days was performed in malnourished hospitalized elderly persons consuming on average 1.3 g/(kg·day) either as a pulse feeding pattern, with >70% of protein provided at lunch, or spread into 4 meals (Bouillanne et al 2013). Significant gains in body cell mass and lean mass, but not handgrip strength, were found only in the pulse-fed group.…”
Section: Protein Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To help older people maintain muscle mass and function, the ESPEN expert group and the PROT-AGE international study group recently recommended a higher protein intake, with at least 1-1.2 g of proteins/kg of body weight/day for healthy older individuals [17,18]. Several authors propose that this protein intake would be more efficient if it were distributed equally between 3 daily meals [17,19,20], while others favor protein pulse feeding with 80% of the protein intake in one meal [21,22]. However, high-protein levels in a single meal can be hard to achieve in elderly people with diminished appetites and chewing difficulties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mamerow et al (2014) recently reported that consuming a moderate amount of protein at each meal stimulated 24-h muscle protein synthesis more effectively than skewing the same total amount of protein intake towards the evening meal. While some data supporting a pulsed (i.e., skewed) delivery of protein appear to superficially conflict with the even-distribution theory, many of the conclusions are in fact supportive and likely only hidden by related issues, such as the quantity of protein consumed at each meal (Arnal et al 1999;Bouillanne et al 2013). For example, in a 6-week trial in hospitalized, older adults, Bouillanne et al (2013) noted that patients who consumed a "pulsed" protein diet (0800 hours: 4.5 g; 1200 hours: 47.8 g; 1600 hours: 2.3 g; 1900 hours: 10.9 g protein) experienced a modest, but significant improvement in lean mass compared with the "spread" protein diet (0800 hours: 12.2 g; 1200 hours: 21 g; 1600 hours: 13.5 g; 1900 hours: 21.2 g protein).…”
Section: Protein Dose and Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some data supporting a pulsed (i.e., skewed) delivery of protein appear to superficially conflict with the even-distribution theory, many of the conclusions are in fact supportive and likely only hidden by related issues, such as the quantity of protein consumed at each meal (Arnal et al 1999;Bouillanne et al 2013). For example, in a 6-week trial in hospitalized, older adults, Bouillanne et al (2013) noted that patients who consumed a "pulsed" protein diet (0800 hours: 4.5 g; 1200 hours: 47.8 g; 1600 hours: 2.3 g; 1900 hours: 10.9 g protein) experienced a modest, but significant improvement in lean mass compared with the "spread" protein diet (0800 hours: 12.2 g; 1200 hours: 21 g; 1600 hours: 13.5 g; 1900 hours: 21.2 g protein). In this patient population, we would argue that the quantity of protein consumed at each meal in the "spread/distributed" protein group (i.e., 12-21 g/meal) was likely insufficient to optimally stimulate muscle protein synthesis across all meals.…”
Section: Protein Dose and Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%