Impact of Post-Fault Active Power Recovery of Photovoltaic Power Generation on Transient Stability

Kawabe, Kentaro; Matsuda, Issei; Tanaka, Kazuyuki

doi:10.1541/ieejpes.136.236

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(As the reader knows, DVS function presumes existence of FRT function, and “added value of DVS function” would be a more accurate formulation, but in this paper, we use the term “value of DVS function” for simplicity.) However, previous studies on FRT/DVS capabilities were confined to evaluation of qualitative merits, or evaluation of quantitative merits on fictional system models. Assessment of true values of FRT/DVS functions involves a complex task of assuming application to actual power systems existing in Japan.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Value comparison between FRT and DVS functions on renewable energy

Jozuka

Iriguchi

Komami

2018

Electrical Engineering Japan

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although FRT capability is claimed in Japanese grid code for RE, DVS capability is not. In some European countries, not only FRT but also DVS is claimed. Whether this choice of our grid code is pragmatically adequate or not? To answer the question, it is necessary to evaluate FRT and DVS capabilities. But the past studies only evaluated qualitative merit of FRT and DVS, or evaluated quantitative merit on fictional system models. Since the authors intend to evaluate FRT and DVS capabilities in existing power system of Japan, some method for the evaluation must be invented. For the evaluation, values of FRT and DVS capabilities are evaluated by reduction amount of stabilizing equipment (i.e. SVC in the paper). The evaluation based on strict optimal SVC disposition is quite difficult, because existing power system must be adequately modeled, because number of SVCs is large and because every power flow conditions must be considered. However, semi‐optimal SVC disposition can be calculated as shown in the paper. As the result, value of FRT is quite larger than value of DVS. And then, our grid code is proved as pragmatically adequate, except some flaw in claimed FRT design that is introduced in the paper.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Value comparison between FRT and DVS functions on renewable energy

Jozuka

Iriguchi

Komami

2018

Electrical Engineering Japan

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…(As the reader knows, DVS function presumes existence of FRT function, and "added value of DVS function" would be a more accurate formulation, but in this paper, we use the term "value of DVS function" for simplicity.) However, previous studies on FRT/DVS capabilities 3,4 were confined to evaluation of qualitative merits, or evaluation of quantitative merits on fictional system models. Assessment of true values of FRT/DVS functions involves a complex task of assuming application to actual power systems existing in Japan.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Value Comparison between FRT and DVS Functions on Renewable Energy

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although FRT capability is claimed in Japanese grid code for RE, DVS capability is not. In some European countries, not only FRT but also DVS is claimed. Whether this choice of our grid code is pragmatically adequate or not? To answer the question, it is necessary to evaluate FRT and DVS capabilities. But the past studies only evaluated qualitative merit of FRT and DVS, or evaluated quantitative merit on fictional system models. Since the authors intend to evaluate FRT and DVS capabilities in existing power system of Japan, some method for the evaluation must be invented. For the evaluation, values of FRT and DVS capabilities are evaluated by reduction amount of stabilizing equipment (i.e. SVC in the paper). The evaluation based on strict optimal SVC disposition is quite difficult, because existing power system must be adequately modeled, because number of SVCs is large and because every power flow conditions must be considered. However, semi-optimal SVC disposition can be calculated as shown in the paper. As the result, value of FRT is quite larger than value of DVS. And then, our grid code is proved as pragmatically adequate, except some flaw in claimed FRT design that is introduced in the paper. K E Y W O R D SDVS, FRT, grid code, induction motor load, power system, renewable energy 1. Evaluation must be applied not to just a simple system model, but to one that appropriately describes real systems. 2.Optimal SVC allocation to maintain system stability must be determined for faults that may occur anywhere in the Electr Eng Jpn. 2018;205:33-40.

show abstract