2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Platelet Reactivity on Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Abstract: In this collaborative meta-analysis, the level of on-treatment platelet reactivity according to the P2Y(12) assay is associated with long-term cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention, including death, MI, and stent thrombosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
72
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 374 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
72
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…34,35 Also, the conducted trials in the cardiology literature are designed to measure reduction in thromboembolic events. 36 To our knowledge, no reports on "over-antiplatelet inhibition" and increased hemorrhagic complications have been reported in the endovascular literature.…”
Section: Delayed Ipsilateral Iph Does Not Appear To Be Related To Thementioning
confidence: 96%
“…34,35 Also, the conducted trials in the cardiology literature are designed to measure reduction in thromboembolic events. 36 To our knowledge, no reports on "over-antiplatelet inhibition" and increased hemorrhagic complications have been reported in the endovascular literature.…”
Section: Delayed Ipsilateral Iph Does Not Appear To Be Related To Thementioning
confidence: 96%
“…74 Despite these associations, the clinical usefulness of platelet function testing has been disputed, frequently based on misapplication of statistical measures that are more appropriately suited for the evaluation of diagnostic tests, such as sensitivity and specificity, not prognostic indicators, such as odds ratios or HR, which describe the multiplicative risk of the condition or hazard. 75 Multivariate models are frequently used to evaluate whether the test is an independent predictor of the outcome.…”
Section: Evaluating the Clinical Usefulness Of Platelet Function Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, biochemical signs of coagulation activation in the acute phase of unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were demonstrated [1,2] and blood clotting activation markers were found to be independent risk factors for recurrence and long-term mortality [3][4][5][6]. In the last years the diffuse use of PCI and stenting stimulated several studies investigating primarily the role of platelet hyper-reactivity in determining clinical outcome [7,8]. On the other hand, scarce data are available on the possible role of blood clotting activation on the prognosis of ACS patients, in the era of PCI and stenting on the top of dual antiplatelet therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%