Abstract:Aim; To compare the impact of the orthodontics-first approach (OFA) with the surgeryfirst approach (SFA), for the correction of dentofacial deformities, on quality of life, anxiety and depression. Materials and methods; Data were collected from 32 patients (aged 17-47 years), all treated through a single multidisciplinary orthognathic clinic. Patients completed a 22-item Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ), a 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) questionnaire and a 9-item Patient Health Qu… Show more
“…The mean values for all OQLQ domains in the total cohort of our patients with malocclusion were lower than in previously published studies (10,(29)(30)(31). The data varies because of differences in study protocols and settings.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…Quality of life has therefore recently been assessed using OQLQ in two groups of patients with dentofacial deformities after the orthodontic-first and orthognathic-first approach in 32 patients. It was shown that the mean OQLQ score and the individual domain scores showed significant improvements at six weeks and six months post-operatively (31). The strength of our study might be in the rather high number of study participants treated and followed-up at the national referral centre.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In the two recent studies referred to above (32,33), quality of life was better or the same in the orthodontic treatment first group in comparison with the surgery first group. More recently, however, the contrary has been shown: in a group of 32 patients, those patients planned for surgery first had a lower total OQLQ score and social domain score than those planned for orthodontics first (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Results comparing quality of life before orthodontic and orthognathic treatment in patients with malocclusion are inconsistent (31)(32)(33). In the two recent studies referred to above (32,33), quality of life was better or the same in the orthodontic treatment first group in comparison with the surgery first group.…”
AbstractIntroductionThe objective of this study was to assess pre-treatment quality of life and the relevant clinical variables in adult patients with malocclusion in order to improve orthodontic treatment strategies.MethodsThe study was conducted in 240 consecutive adult patients with malocclusions divided into two groups: patients for whom an orthodontic treatment plan was considered, and patients for whom an orthognathic treatment plan was selected. Patients were examined between December 2015 and February 2017, at the School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade. Malocclusion severity was recorded using the Peer Assessment Rating index pre-treatment score. Skeletal malocclusion parameters were measured using lateral cephalometric radiographs. Quality of life was assessed by means of a generic questionnaire (Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36)), and the disease-specific Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ).ResultsThere were significant differences in the mean values of the OQLQ domain scores between orthodontic and orthognathic patients. Patients for whom orthodontic treatment was planned had statistically significantly lower scores in comparison to those for whom orthognathic treatment was planned. This was the case in all OQLQ domains except for “Awareness of facial deformity”. Statistically significant correlations (p<0.05) were presented between OQLQ scores and following demographic and clinical variables: gender, age, malocclusion severity, maxillary and mandibular sagittal, maxillary vertical, and lower incisor positions, intermaxillary angle, and the Beck Depression Inventory and Beck Anxiety Inventory levels. The independent predictors for the planning of orthodontic and orthognathic treatment in patients with malocclusion were two OQLQ domains, “Facial aesthetics” and “Awareness of facial deformity”, as well as total OQLQ score, after adjustment for demographic characteristics, skeletal parameters, anxiety and depression.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that patients for whom orthodontic treatment was planned demonstrated better quality of life according to the OQLQ scores in comparison to those for whom orthognathic therapy was planned.
“…The mean values for all OQLQ domains in the total cohort of our patients with malocclusion were lower than in previously published studies (10,(29)(30)(31). The data varies because of differences in study protocols and settings.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…Quality of life has therefore recently been assessed using OQLQ in two groups of patients with dentofacial deformities after the orthodontic-first and orthognathic-first approach in 32 patients. It was shown that the mean OQLQ score and the individual domain scores showed significant improvements at six weeks and six months post-operatively (31). The strength of our study might be in the rather high number of study participants treated and followed-up at the national referral centre.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In the two recent studies referred to above (32,33), quality of life was better or the same in the orthodontic treatment first group in comparison with the surgery first group. More recently, however, the contrary has been shown: in a group of 32 patients, those patients planned for surgery first had a lower total OQLQ score and social domain score than those planned for orthodontics first (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Results comparing quality of life before orthodontic and orthognathic treatment in patients with malocclusion are inconsistent (31)(32)(33). In the two recent studies referred to above (32,33), quality of life was better or the same in the orthodontic treatment first group in comparison with the surgery first group.…”
AbstractIntroductionThe objective of this study was to assess pre-treatment quality of life and the relevant clinical variables in adult patients with malocclusion in order to improve orthodontic treatment strategies.MethodsThe study was conducted in 240 consecutive adult patients with malocclusions divided into two groups: patients for whom an orthodontic treatment plan was considered, and patients for whom an orthognathic treatment plan was selected. Patients were examined between December 2015 and February 2017, at the School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade. Malocclusion severity was recorded using the Peer Assessment Rating index pre-treatment score. Skeletal malocclusion parameters were measured using lateral cephalometric radiographs. Quality of life was assessed by means of a generic questionnaire (Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36)), and the disease-specific Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ).ResultsThere were significant differences in the mean values of the OQLQ domain scores between orthodontic and orthognathic patients. Patients for whom orthodontic treatment was planned had statistically significantly lower scores in comparison to those for whom orthognathic treatment was planned. This was the case in all OQLQ domains except for “Awareness of facial deformity”. Statistically significant correlations (p<0.05) were presented between OQLQ scores and following demographic and clinical variables: gender, age, malocclusion severity, maxillary and mandibular sagittal, maxillary vertical, and lower incisor positions, intermaxillary angle, and the Beck Depression Inventory and Beck Anxiety Inventory levels. The independent predictors for the planning of orthodontic and orthognathic treatment in patients with malocclusion were two OQLQ domains, “Facial aesthetics” and “Awareness of facial deformity”, as well as total OQLQ score, after adjustment for demographic characteristics, skeletal parameters, anxiety and depression.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that patients for whom orthodontic treatment was planned demonstrated better quality of life according to the OQLQ scores in comparison to those for whom orthognathic therapy was planned.
“…Many patients seek dental and maxillofacial surgery not only to improve function but also for esthetic improvements in the smile or face. Therefore, orthognathic surgery has a potential impact on the quality of life, psychosocial well-being, facial esthetics, and oral function [ 1 ]. It is performed to correct dentoskeletal discrepancies and seek harmony between upper and lower jaws, improving occlusal function.…”
Introduction and importance
Orthognathic surgery aims to restore the functional and esthetic standards of the face and non-surgical or minimally invasive procedures have been optimizing the results of facial orthosurgical treatments. This case report aimed to show the use of minimally invasive techniques that, associated with orthognathic surgery, represent a trend in current oral and maxillofacial rehabilitation.
Case presentation
A female patient, 28 years old, white, sought care from the Dentistry team of the São Vicente de Paulo Hospital, in Passo Fundo, Brazil, complaining of mandibular prognathism, anteroposterior maxillary deficiency, dental crowding, malocclusion, functional and esthetic changes that negatively affected her psychosocial interactions and stomatognathic function. The treatment involved orthodontics, orthognathic surgery, and orofacial harmonization with dermal fillers.
Clinical discussion
The multidisciplinarity among the specialties of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Traumatology, Orthodontics, and Orofacial Harmonization add and contribute to the process of planning and implementing the treatment proposed, as well as the prognosis toward patient satisfaction.
Conclusion
The surgical procedure associated with minimally invasive facial harmonization not only corrected the functional complaint of the patient but also played an important role in improving facial harmony, contributing significantly to self-esteem.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.