2010 7th International Symposium on Communication Systems, Networks &Amp; Digital Signal Processing (CSNDSP 2010) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/csndsp16145.2010.5580459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of node density and mobility on the performance of AODV and DSR in MANETS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Banoj Kumar et al [19] discussed AODV and DSR routing protocols and impact of node mobility on MANET based on these protocols. Performance of MANET is sensitive to node density and node mobility [20]. It is observed that performance of MANET degrades with decrease in node density.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Banoj Kumar et al [19] discussed AODV and DSR routing protocols and impact of node mobility on MANET based on these protocols. Performance of MANET is sensitive to node density and node mobility [20]. It is observed that performance of MANET degrades with decrease in node density.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research contributions [20] [19] and [23] done to evaluate performance of network under different test conditions. Test conditions include parameters like node density, transmission packet size, mobility of node, pause time and speed of mobile nodes etc.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each node moves towards its chosen destination and pauses on arrival for a random period of time within a specified range before selecting a new destination. While this mobility model causes the network topology to change over time, it is often criticized as being unrealistic because actual network nodes in real life networks are not likely to move about in such a random way [18] .Also because of the non-uniform node speed distribution, Random Way Point exhibits speed decay [19] . Another issue is that the distribution of nodes is not even in the network field using this model, this is due to bias towards the centre of the simulation area.…”
Section: B Node Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive simulations [12,13,15,16] have been done in recent years to evaluate the performance of AODV and other protocols; however, in our paper we have studied the performance variation of AODV by changing some parameters as node-density, pause time, and rate of transmission of packets, over the area of 1500×1500m 2 . On the other hand, path loss propagation model has been changed with every variation along with data traffic of CBR is applied between various source and destination.…”
Section: Simulation Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%