IEEE Conference on Ultra Wideband Systems and Technologies, 2003
DOI: 10.1109/uwbst.2003.1267868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of NLOS propagation upon ranging precision in UWB systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
80
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
4
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results were compared to an indirect approach in which TOA estimates are obtained by the ML-TOA estimator and a least squares technique is then used to localize the MS. The direct ML location estimation is shown to From (14) and the well-known identity tr(AB) = tr (BA), the elements of the Fisher's information matrix are given by …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results were compared to an indirect approach in which TOA estimates are obtained by the ML-TOA estimator and a least squares technique is then used to localize the MS. The direct ML location estimation is shown to From (14) and the well-known identity tr(AB) = tr (BA), the elements of the Fisher's information matrix are given by …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of the NLOS situations are also discussed. The NLOS situation is another major challenge for indoor positioning for it can cause large TOA estimation bias that in turn result in large location estimation errors [14]. There are optimization methods which can be used to mitigate the error due to NLOS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the NLOS range measurement is much larger than the LOS range one. It was observed that the NLOS bias errors of the range measurements are much larger than the range measurement errors of the LOS scenarios [32].…”
Section: Source Localization Under Los/nlos Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The transceivers in this study had an LOS path, whereas signals in our study had non-line-ofsight (NLOS) harsher propagation conditions because of travel through building materials. Attempts to reduce the localization error in the NLOS case were made, e.g., [2], [3], [4], but excessive propagation delay in the NLOS condition was a limiting factor of precise ranging [3]. Wylie and Holtzman [2] used statistical information of the difference in the variance of time of arrival (TOA) in the line-of-sight (LOS) case and in the NLOS case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wylie and Holtzman [2] used statistical information of the difference in the variance of time of arrival (TOA) in the line-of-sight (LOS) case and in the NLOS case. Algorithms that detects the first path under a multipath condition were developed, e.g., [3], [4]. Our algorithm estimates location of a transmitter with very small error even with the considerable ranging error caused by excessive propagation delay in the NLOS case overcoming ranging limitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%