2007
DOI: 10.1029/2007gl030700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of model physics on estimating the surface mass balance of the Greenland ice sheet

Abstract: [1] Long-term predictions of sea level rise from increased Greenland ice sheet melting have been derived using Positive Degree Day models only. It is, however, unknown precisely what uncertainties are associated with applying this simple surface melt parameterization for future climate. We compare the behavior of a Positive Degree Day and Energy Balance/Snowpack model for estimating the surface mass balance of the Greenland ice sheet under a warming climate. Both models were first tuned to give similar values … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
76
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
76
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is clear from the literature that unlike a dry , the uncertainty in the ice albedo as seen from an SMB model is greater than the observational uncertainty. Previous publications report values of 0.4, 0.58, 0.4, 0.34 and 0.5 for a ice used in full EB SMB models [Bougamont et al, 2007;Greuell and Konzelmann, 1994;Mernild et al, 2008;Oerlemans and Knap, 1998;Pritchard et al, 2008]. Paterson [1994b] also quotes a possible ice albedo range of 0.3-0.5.…”
Section: A12 Parameter a Icementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is clear from the literature that unlike a dry , the uncertainty in the ice albedo as seen from an SMB model is greater than the observational uncertainty. Previous publications report values of 0.4, 0.58, 0.4, 0.34 and 0.5 for a ice used in full EB SMB models [Bougamont et al, 2007;Greuell and Konzelmann, 1994;Mernild et al, 2008;Oerlemans and Knap, 1998;Pritchard et al, 2008]. Paterson [1994b] also quotes a possible ice albedo range of 0.3-0.5.…”
Section: A12 Parameter a Icementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a threshold is generally confirmed in coupled ice-sheet simulations. The temperature range may be larger when additional uncertainty from the melt model is included (Bougamont et al 2007); however, Stone et al (2010) find the threshold to be substantially lower using new boundary conditions for ice-sheet geometry, surface temperature and precipitation. For sustained 49 CO 2 forcing, corresponding to a mean Greenland warming of around 8°C, Ridley et al (2005) find deglaciation to take around 3,000 years to complete using Had-CM3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of a PDD-model to derive ablation generally leads to overestimation of the climate sensitivity ( Van de Wal, 1996), due to spatial and temporal variability of the degree-day factors (Van den Broeke et al, 2010) and not explicitly accounting for changes in e.g. lapse rates and albedo feedbacks in a transient climate (Bougamont et al, 2007). In view of the complexities that determine the spatial and temporal evolution of SMB, its inclusion in ice sheet models needs improvement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%