2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Model for End-stage Liver Disease Score in Post–Liver Transplantation Prognosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In earlier reports, 1-month survival was 92.2% 12 and 1-year survival was 83% 13 and 80.9%. 12 More recent publications indicated a comparable 30-day survival rate of 87.2%, 14 a 3-month survival rate of 80.8%, 14 and a 1-year survival rate of 78.9%. 15 However, we did not restrict on cases with complete follow-ups, and patients discharged from ICU before expiration of observation period were consequently classified as dropouts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In earlier reports, 1-month survival was 92.2% 12 and 1-year survival was 83% 13 and 80.9%. 12 More recent publications indicated a comparable 30-day survival rate of 87.2%, 14 a 3-month survival rate of 80.8%, 14 and a 1-year survival rate of 78.9%. 15 However, we did not restrict on cases with complete follow-ups, and patients discharged from ICU before expiration of observation period were consequently classified as dropouts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…7 However, results showing prognostic relevance of preoperative values regarding postoperative outcome must be interpreted carefully as sufficient differentiations seem to depend on distinct parameter classifications. 5,14 Other results even negated notable associations, 6 whereas certain modifications might still be of benefit as multiplication with donor age (D-MELD) enabled sufficient stratification of postoperative outcome in one study, 8 for example. Moreover, MELD is still discussed to be connected with posttransplant quality of life as further important outcome parameter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%