2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.11.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of methanogenic pre-treatment on the performance of an aerobic MBR system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, adequate removal of the solids before the submerged HF module is key to mitigating blocking. Methanogenic [125] and chlorinated [126] pretreatments have also been explored, as well as hybrid processes, both of which add an additional unit operation before the membrane module [127][128][129][130]. With respect to (ii), physical cleaning tends to remove reversible fouling while chemical cleaning can remove some irreversible fouling.…”
Section: Blocking and Blocking Mitigation In Submerged Hf Modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, adequate removal of the solids before the submerged HF module is key to mitigating blocking. Methanogenic [125] and chlorinated [126] pretreatments have also been explored, as well as hybrid processes, both of which add an additional unit operation before the membrane module [127][128][129][130]. With respect to (ii), physical cleaning tends to remove reversible fouling while chemical cleaning can remove some irreversible fouling.…”
Section: Blocking and Blocking Mitigation In Submerged Hf Modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Volatile fatty acids (VFA) were determined using gas chromatography with a flame ionization detector following the method described elsewhere . Biogas production was measured using a Milli GasCounter MGC‐10 (Ritter, Germany) and its composition was measured in a gas chromatograph as described previously …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Biogas production was measured using a Milli GasCounter MGC-10 (Ritter, Germany) and its composition was measured in a gas chromatograph as described previously. 23 Biomass concentration in the biofilm attached to the plastic support was also determined. Ten plastic supports were sonicated for 10 min in 100 mL of permeate at 65% of amplitude using a probe sonicator (UP200s, Dr. Hielscher).…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter along with simple operation, limited land requirements and the ability to 8 treat at high rate (i.e. at low HRTs) justify the wide UASB application in developing tropical countries [41][42][43].…”
Section: Technologies For the Biological Treatment Of Industrial Wastmentioning
confidence: 99%