2010
DOI: 10.1117/12.864120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of mask topography and multilayer stack on high NA imaging of EUV masks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The broad band mask reflectivity depends on illumination angle. It can be represented as a map in the pupil plane as shown in Figure 4 (see also [2] ). Average broad band reflectivity over the angles of incidence is determined by the particular illumination type.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The broad band mask reflectivity depends on illumination angle. It can be represented as a map in the pupil plane as shown in Figure 4 (see also [2] ). Average broad band reflectivity over the angles of incidence is determined by the particular illumination type.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hopkins method used in the simulations of the last section is inaccurate for EUV lithography simulation because it does not take into account the strong dependence of the diffraction orders on the angle of incidence on the EUV mask [5]. This is illustrated in a dramatic way by considering the effect of focus induced image shift discussed next.…”
Section: Enhanced Hopkins Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The exposure system operates with a certain NA allowing light rays to interact with the photomask over wider range of angles of incidence. Since reflectivity is angle dependent this will result in mask-induced apodization in the entrance pupil of the projection optics resulting in non-telecentricity of the system and overlay impact [1] .…”
Section: Euv Mask Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%