1976
DOI: 10.1007/bf00280847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of man's activities on the chemical composition in the sediments of Lakes Ontario, Erie and Huron

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
7

Year Published

1984
1984
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
39
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The earliest studies to use lake sediment records to infer recent changes in heavy metal pollution explored variations in the concentrations of Hg and Pb (Thomas 1972;Aston et al 1973;Kemp and Thomas 1976). Their interpretations are based on the trends and timing of concentration changes, allowing them to infer an increasing pollution load.…”
Section: Raw Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The earliest studies to use lake sediment records to infer recent changes in heavy metal pollution explored variations in the concentrations of Hg and Pb (Thomas 1972;Aston et al 1973;Kemp and Thomas 1976). Their interpretations are based on the trends and timing of concentration changes, allowing them to infer an increasing pollution load.…”
Section: Raw Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, V, which is supplied via erosion of basaltic soils, closely follows the Cu increase except for two episodes of elevated Cu concentration which are considered to reflect Cu mining Al concentration to support their case for enhanced pollution (using Al, assumed to have a uniform flux to the sediment, to correct for the effect of high and variable natural supply of CaCO 3 and organic matter). Kemp and Thomas (1976) develop this approach for their Great Lake records, applying a normalisation that retained the original concentration units. Norton and Kahl (1987) formalised this approach, using Eq.…”
Section: Ratio To Passive Tracermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sediment enrichment factor [49][50][51][52] and geoaccumulation index [53] are usually applied to evaluate the sources and degree of pollution. For this study, the sediment enrichment factor [49] is defined as follows:…”
Section: Digestion and Chemical Analysis Of Bottom Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, to quantify the magnitude of the contamination relative to natural levels, raw concentrations are commonly normalised both to the representative background concentrations of the element of interest and to a conservative reference element which controls for variability of sediment properties such as particle size and organic concentration (Abrahim and Parker, 2008;Duce et al, 1975;Kemp and Thomas, 1976;Pompeani et al, 2013;Schütz and Rahn, 1982;Shotyk, 1996a;Zoller et al, 1974). This double normalisation method produces a ratio describing the magnitude of anthropogenic pollution termed the Enrichment Factor (EF) (Duce et al, 1975;Shotyk, 1996b;Sinex and Helz, 1981;Zoller et al, 1974).…”
Section: Enrichment Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the potential post-depositional transport of metals outlined in the previous section, both lake sediment (Abbott and Wolfe, 2003;Bindler et al, 2001;Brännvall et al, 2001a;Camarero et al, 2009;Cooke et al, 2007;Dillon and Evans, 1982;Evans, 1986;Foster et al, 1991;Kemp and Thomas, 1976;Klaminder et al, 2010;Norton and Kahl, 1987;Outridge et al, 2002;Pompeani et al, 2013;Renberg et al, 2002;Renberg et al, 1994;Yang et al, 2007) and soils (Brännvall et al, 2001b;Friedland et al, 1992;Fujikawa et al, 2000;Nickel et al, 2015;Reiners et al, 1975;Steinnes et al, 1997) have been used as archives of atmospheric metal deposition.…”
Section: Lake Sediments and Soils As Archives Of Metal Contaminantsmentioning
confidence: 99%