Impact of lymph node staging systems in predicting outcome in patients with ampullary cancer

Abstract

Backgrounds/Aims: Lymph node (LN) metastasis though, is a poor prognostic factor for ampullary carcinoma (APC), the impact of Lymph node ratio (LNR) and Logarithm odds of positive lymph node (LODDS) in the long-term survival remains controversial. We evaluated the factors affecting the long-term outcome in APC patients with emphasis on LNR and LODDS. Methods: The prospectively collected data of 198 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for APC was analyzed after excluding 12 patients for various reasons. Factors affecting Disease specific survival (DSS) and Recurrence free survival (RFS) were analyzed with special reference to LN positivity, LNR and LODDS. Results: Out of 186, 117 (62.9%) patients were alive at a median follow-up of 39.5 months and 72 (38.7%) developed recurrence. The overall 5-year DSS was 59.3% & RFS 54.9%. Univariate analysis showed T-stage, tumor differentiation, perineural invasion, LN positivity, LNR and LODDS was significantly affected DSS and RFS. On multivariate analysis, perineural invasion, LN positivity, LNR and LODDS lost its significance for DSS and RFS. AUC for prediction of DSS and RFS for LNR was 0.654 (p＜0.001) & 0.629 (p=0.003) respectively and for LODDS, it was 0.697 (p＜0.001) & 0.677 (p=0.001) respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of LNR (0.1) for DSS were 37.7% & 83.8% and for RFS were 36.1% & 83.3%; for LODDS (−1.00), sensitivity and specificity for DSS was 62.3% and 67.5% and for RFS it was 59.7% and 66.7% respectively. Conclusions: LNR and LODDS although independently seem to affect the RFS and DSS, albeit have a low sensitivity and specificity in predicting DSS and RFS.

Duodenaladenome und -karzinome: chirurgische Therapiekonzepte

“…Ziel laut Leitlinie für Pankreaskarzinome sollte die Entfernung von 12 Lymphknoten sein 36 . Grundsätzlich ist das Auftreten von Lymphknotenmetastasen mit einer schlechteren Prognose vergesellschaftet 37 , 38 . Gegenstand aktueller Diskussion ist die Bedeutung der erweiterten Lymphadenektomie gegenüber dem Standard.…”