Background: Extramedullary plasmacytoma is an uncommon entity that most commonly involves nasopharynx or upper respiratory tract. Involvement of the gastrointestinal tract occurs in approximated 10% of cases. Isolated primary plasmacytoma of colon is rare and only 7 well documented cases have been reported in the literature.
Background: Role of tumor markers in gall bladder carcinoma (GBC) is not well established. We evaluated the prognostic value of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and carcinoma embryonic antigen (CEA) in patients with GBC. Methods: Of the 225 patients of GBC enrolled,176 patients were included in the study (excluded 49 patients with jaundice). Patients were divided into 3 groups; resectable n = 92, unresectable n = 17, metastatic n = 67. The clinicopathological characteristics, tumor markers and survival data were analysed. The cutoff values of CA19-9 & CEA for predicting metastases were computed using receiver operating characteristic curve. Kaplan Meir survival and Cox regression analysis were done for factors predicting survival and recurrence. Results: The median value of Ca19-9 was significantly higher in metastatic group [resectable: 21.3, unresectable: 53.9 and metastatic: 79; p < 0.001] but not for CEA [3.5, 7.8 and 5 ng/ml (p = 0.20)]. A cutoff value of 72 IU/ml for CA19-9, 5 ng/ml for CEA had a sensitivity and specificity of 52 and 80%, 51 and 72% respectively for detection of metastatic disease. Median, 3-year & 5-year survival were significantly lower in patients with CEA > 4 (p = 0.041), Ca19.9 > 37 (p = 0.019), T3/T4 (p = 0.001), node positive (p = 0.001) and presence of perineural invasion (p = 0.001). However, on multivariate analysis, only Ca19.9 > 37 predicted recurrence (p = 0.002, HR 5.8). Conclusions: Raised CA19.9 and CEA predict metastatic disease in patients with GBC without jaundice with a high specificity and may help in prognostication of the patient. CA19-9 was better than CEA in prediction of tumor burden and in predicting recurrence.
Background: Although mortality of Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy (WPD) is reduced to <5%, morbidity still remains between 30 and 50%. Pancreaticojejunal anastomosis remains the main cause of morbidity. Blumgart anastomosis using transpancreatic U sutures has been proposed to decrease the leak rate and its associated morbidity. We analyzed the results of Blumgart anastomosis applied in consecutive cases of WPD. Methods: Of 189 patients with periampullary or pancreatic cancer admitted, 100 patients underwent WPD. Except for 2 patients (no duct identified preoperatively), all patients underwent pancreaticojejunostomy by the Blumgart anastomotic technique. The records of 98 patients were analyzed for pancreatic leak and its related complications using the definitions given by the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery. Results: Of 98 patients, 63 were men. The mean operative time was 390 min (270–690 min) and blood loss was 275 ml (100–1,000 ml). Overall mortality was 3.06%. The clinically significant pancreatic anastomotic failure leak was seen in only 7 (7.14%) cases (grade B, n = 4; grade C, n = 3) with one patient requiring relaparotomy due to leak. Only one patient died due to a leak-related complication. Conclusion: Blumgart pancreaticojejunal anastomosis can be routinely used for reconstruction in WPD. It is a technically simple procedure and is associated with low rates of fistula and its related complications.
Trans-abdominal ligation of the thoracic duct in patients with chylothorax after esophagectomy is technically easy and safe. It may be preferred over the trans-thoracic approach, especially after an initial trans-hiatal esophagectomy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.