2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of land use changes on the storage of soil organic carbon in active and recalcitrant pools in a humid tropical region of India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
47
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our estimates were consistent with the values from 27-and 87year-old Chinese fir stands reported from other studies in Fujian Province (68.6 and 76.0 t ha −1 ; Yang et al 2003 andZhong et al 2008, respectively), but were far lower than the average value of 194 t ha −1 for different forest ecosystems in China (Zhou et al 2000). Similar to our results, many studies have reported that the SOC stock increases with plantation age, e.g., in rubber plantations (Nath et al 2018). Our SOC storage estimates for the mature stage (22 years old) were consistent with those for Chinese fir at a similar age in mixed stands (68.6 t ha −1 ) (Yang et al 2003), but were greater than those for a pure Chinese fir stand (56.0 t ha −1 , soil depth 0-40 cm).…”
Section: Soc Stocksupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our estimates were consistent with the values from 27-and 87year-old Chinese fir stands reported from other studies in Fujian Province (68.6 and 76.0 t ha −1 ; Yang et al 2003 andZhong et al 2008, respectively), but were far lower than the average value of 194 t ha −1 for different forest ecosystems in China (Zhou et al 2000). Similar to our results, many studies have reported that the SOC stock increases with plantation age, e.g., in rubber plantations (Nath et al 2018). Our SOC storage estimates for the mature stage (22 years old) were consistent with those for Chinese fir at a similar age in mixed stands (68.6 t ha −1 ) (Yang et al 2003), but were greater than those for a pure Chinese fir stand (56.0 t ha −1 , soil depth 0-40 cm).…”
Section: Soc Stocksupporting
confidence: 92%
“…SOC can be divided into active carbon (AC) and recalcitrant/passive carbon pools, which make different contributions to the atmospheric CO 2 content due to varying sequestration and release processes (Nath et al 2018), but also interact. Understanding the nature and cycling of SOC and controlling factors is critical to inform recommendations for land use and management to maximize the uptake and stability of SOC (Malik et al 2018).…”
Section: Soc Stockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of such changes is important to ensure regional ecological security and to promote the coordinated development of the regional society, economy and ecology. This study also shows that ecosystems with large carbon reserves may not exhibit high carbon sequestration, which is consistent with the result of an earlier study [55]. Studying the supply and demand of carbon storage and storage services in the QLB, so as to mitigate climate change in the QTP's ecological environment, reducing the emission level of carbon, and improving storage capacity, are all essential measures for improving global ecological services in sensitive areas.…”
Section: Measurement Of Carbon Storage In the Qlbsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In wetland ecosystems, the concentrations of the SOC fractions have changed due to species invasion (Cheng et al 2008;Yang et al 2017a), salinity increase (Yang et al 2018) and land reclamation (Huo et al 2018;Zhang et al 2018). SOC LF I and LF II decreased due to a decrease in the organic matter input combined with the fast mineralisation of soil organic matter (SOM) during the conversion of pasture lands to agricultural lands, degradation of natural forest and tillage (Liu et al 2017;Muñoz-Romero et al 2017;Nath et al 2018). In this study, although the concentrations of LOC (including SOC LF I and SOC LF II) in the LDM decreased slightly compared to PRM (P > 0.05; Fig.…”
Section: Effects Of Marsh Degradation On the Concentrations Of Soc Frmentioning
confidence: 99%