2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10404-020-2319-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of inertia and channel angles on flow distribution in microfluidic junctions

Abstract: In the present paper, we provide evidence of the vital impact of inertia on the flow in microfluidic networks, which is disclosed by the appearance of nonlinear velocity-pressure coupling. The experiments and numerical analysis of microfluidic junctions within the range of moderate Reynolds number (1 < Re < 250) revealed that inertial effects are of high relevance when Re > 10. Thus, our results estimate the applicability limit of the linear relationship between the flow rate and pressure drop in channels, com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This condition was enhanced for the rectangular shape. Moreover, it was proven from experimental results that angular edges (as can be identified in the rhomboidal and rectangular shapes) are more prone to accumulate bubbles than round edges [ 55 , 56 ]. Thus, in our final device, we incorporated the elliptical shape for realizing the microfluidic reservoir.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This condition was enhanced for the rectangular shape. Moreover, it was proven from experimental results that angular edges (as can be identified in the rhomboidal and rectangular shapes) are more prone to accumulate bubbles than round edges [ 55 , 56 ]. Thus, in our final device, we incorporated the elliptical shape for realizing the microfluidic reservoir.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We enforce conservation of flow and equal pressures at the junction outlets. Models exist to predict the pressure losses over junctions [22,21,73]. However, in our preliminary studies, these did not lead to a significant improvement in approximation quality and were thus not included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…16,32,48 Furthermore, models exist to predict the pressure losses over junctions. 31,32,85 However, in our preliminary studies, these did not lead to a significant improvement in approximation quality and were thus not included. Furthermore, we found little difference in accuracy over preserving total versus static pressure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other models aim to preserve total pressure, that is, static plus dynamic pressure 16,32,48 . Furthermore, models exist to predict the pressure losses over junctions 31,32,85 . However, in our preliminary studies, these did not lead to a significant improvement in approximation quality and were thus not included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%