2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Improved Maize Adoption on Welfare of Farm Households in Malawi: A Panel Data Analysis

Abstract: This paper assesses improved maize adoption in Malawi and examines the link between adoption and household welfare using a three-year household panel data. The distributional effect of maize technology adoption is also investigated by looking at impacts across wealth and gender groups. We applied control function approach and IV regression to control for endogeneity of input subsidy and improved maize adoption. We found that modern maize variety adoption is positively correlated with the household's own maize … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

18
121
3
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(24 reference statements)
18
121
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Many authors try to derive conclusions on household food security indirectly by measuring, instead, the impact on household welfare (Karanja et al, 2003;Shiferaw et al, 2008;Asfaw et al, 2012a;Kathage et al, 2012;Mason and Smale, 2013;Bezu et al, 2014), through monetary (income and expenditure) or production measures (farm production and yields). This literature shows that the effect of agricultural technologies on welfare is significantly positive, but one problem of the monetary and production indicators used is that, while adequately capturing the impact on food access and availability, a number of assumptions are made on food utilization (Hidrobo et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many authors try to derive conclusions on household food security indirectly by measuring, instead, the impact on household welfare (Karanja et al, 2003;Shiferaw et al, 2008;Asfaw et al, 2012a;Kathage et al, 2012;Mason and Smale, 2013;Bezu et al, 2014), through monetary (income and expenditure) or production measures (farm production and yields). This literature shows that the effect of agricultural technologies on welfare is significantly positive, but one problem of the monetary and production indicators used is that, while adequately capturing the impact on food access and availability, a number of assumptions are made on food utilization (Hidrobo et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the above mentioned studies share some common features: i) they mainly assess the effects of single technologies (usually only improved seeds) disregarding the impact of other important innovations; ii) they evaluate the impact of agricultural technologies at district or regional level (nationally representative surveys are used only by Mason and Smale (2013) and Bezu et al (2014)); iii) they limit the analysis to a single dimension of the food security, mainly access to food, disregarding that it is a multidimensional and complex phenomenon which cannot be understood through single (monetary) indicators, but that a combination of measures and indicators is needed to fully reflect all four dimensions of food security.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otra forma de generar valor es satisfacer la demanda alimenticia, y el uso de semillas mejoradas tiene impacto en la seguridad alimentaria de los hogares, sobre todo de los más pobres, al permitir satisfacer la cantidad requerida de alimentos debido a que los excedentes generados aumentan el consumo per cápita Bezu et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Another way to create value is to meet food demand, and the use of improved seeds have impact on food security of households, especially the poorest, allowing meet the required amount of food because the surpluses generated increase per capita consumption Bezu et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since majority of them relies on subsistence agriculture for their own food and as a source of income (Larsen et al, 2014), improving the performance of the agricultural sector is the main pathway out of poverty and to improve the livelihood of most of the people in this region (Dawson et al, 2016). However, the agriculture sector of most of the SSA countries has not been able to ensure food security in both at the national and the household level (Bezu et al, 2014). Several biophysical and socioeconomic factors have been identified as key Organic fertilization systems can to increase crop productivity and increase the sustainability of agro-ecosystems (García-Orenes et al, 2013; Macci et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%