2008
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.107.045351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Image-Space Resolution Modeling for Studies with the High-Resolution Research Tomograph

Abstract: Brain PET in small structures is challenged by low resolution inducing bias in the activity measurements. Improved spatial resolution may be obtained by using dedicated tomographs and more comprehensive modeling of the acquisition system during reconstruction. In this study, we assess the impact of resolution modeling (RM) during reconstruction on image quality and on the estimates of biologic parameters in a clinical study performed on a high-resolution research tomograph. Methods: An accelerated list-mode or… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
196
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(203 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
196
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the model fitting we chose to parameterize the data as a weighted sum of 3-dimensional Gaussian distributions as opposed to using one Gaussian distribution combined from 2 half Gaussian functions (Panin et al 2006, Rapisarda et al 2010. This allowed us to model the long tails observed on the PSF unted for when only one Gaussian is used (Sureau et al 2008, Cloquet et al 2010. Other models could also be considered like the asymmetric modified Pearson model (Cloquet et al 2010).…”
Section: Experimental Design and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the model fitting we chose to parameterize the data as a weighted sum of 3-dimensional Gaussian distributions as opposed to using one Gaussian distribution combined from 2 half Gaussian functions (Panin et al 2006, Rapisarda et al 2010. This allowed us to model the long tails observed on the PSF unted for when only one Gaussian is used (Sureau et al 2008, Cloquet et al 2010. Other models could also be considered like the asymmetric modified Pearson model (Cloquet et al 2010).…”
Section: Experimental Design and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, improved resolution could be seen in the parametric V T images (Figure 3). Much higher differences between OP-OSEM and PVC-OP-OSEM were found in studies performed by Sureau et al (2008) and Varrone et al (2009). Both studies used dopamine transporter radioligands, which show a high contrast between the striatum and the surrounding tissue.…”
Section: Tracer Kinetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Whilst the CT and MRI provide an overall spatial uncertainty of the order of 2 mm, the spatial resolution of the current commercially available PET/CT systems is more than double [90]. However, extensive research and development is currently under way aiming to improve the spatial resolution of PET images concentrating on different aspects of the image acquisition and reconstruction: partial volume effect, [91] depth of interaction, [92] scanner bed wobbling, [93] resolution modeling, [94] etc. Some time ago Siemens announced the introduction of a new HI-REZ PET/CT system that uses measured point spread function (PSF) matrix throughout the field of view (FOV) of the PET scanner to de-convolve the PET slice onto a 2 mm spatial resolution image.…”
Section: Future Aspects and Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In lung cancer patients, as well as other cancer sites severely affected by the respiratory motion (liver, esophagus, etc), 4D PET/CT should be sought of as the prerogative for an accurate both anatomical and functional pin-pointing tool [55][56][57]96,97]. In conjunction with beam delivery systems equipped with Real-time Position Management (RPM) option, 4D PET/CT might open a door for dose escalation protocols [92][93][94][95][96][97]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%