2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.01.084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of image quality on deformable image registration performances in pelvis patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, motion artifacts during the image acquisition can result in implausible anatomy (Yamamoto et al 2008 , Persson et al 2010 ) and implants such as prostheses in the imaging area can lead to streaking or voids (Ritter et al 2009 , Fontenele et al 2018 , Lee et al 2021 ). As these artifacts disrupt the true image intensity gradients of the patient tissue several papers have demonstrated decreased intensity-based DIR quality in their presence (Serban et al 2008 , Sonke and Belderbos 2010 , Fusella et al 2016 ) (figure 4 ).…”
Section: Source Of Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, motion artifacts during the image acquisition can result in implausible anatomy (Yamamoto et al 2008 , Persson et al 2010 ) and implants such as prostheses in the imaging area can lead to streaking or voids (Ritter et al 2009 , Fontenele et al 2018 , Lee et al 2021 ). As these artifacts disrupt the true image intensity gradients of the patient tissue several papers have demonstrated decreased intensity-based DIR quality in their presence (Serban et al 2008 , Sonke and Belderbos 2010 , Fusella et al 2016 ) (figure 4 ).…”
Section: Source Of Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%