2010 10th IEEE International Conference on Solid-State and Integrated Circuit Technology 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icsict.2010.5667684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of hump effect on MOSFET mismatch in the sub-threshold area for low power analog applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, as plotted in Fig. 8(b), gate voltage matching is well improved thanks to this much bigger total equivalent area as expected by (5). Analog applications are often biased under threshold for low power concerns and matching performances.…”
Section: Polmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, as plotted in Fig. 8(b), gate voltage matching is well improved thanks to this much bigger total equivalent area as expected by (5). Analog applications are often biased under threshold for low power concerns and matching performances.…”
Section: Polmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…7 (m is the number of identical transistor placed in parallel). As a consequence, the total area of parasitic devices is increased by a factor m and the worst value for the gate voltage matching is so given by (5): AVT <Jell VG)= (5) .Jm. 2WHUMP• L Therefore, more the number m of transistors placed in parallel is important, the better will be the gate voltage matching in sub-threshold region (decreased of factor -vrn)…”
Section: Polmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, all these contributions activate the parasitic transistor at the active/trench corner with a reduced threshold voltage. This effect has an impact on the subthreshold region and can explain the IOFF leakage current increase for the TGT architectures [12].…”
Section: A Mgt Transistors Benchmarkmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this analysis, only actual possible variations are reported, since cell variability is generated based on a targeted OxRAM technology. Moreover, the variability (including transistor mismatch [28,29]) targets the CMOS subsystem and especially the memory cell access transistor as its impact on the memory cell electrical characteristics is dominant [30]. Process variation parameters used for CMOS transistors are provided by ST-Microelectronics (Crolles, France).…”
Section: Monte Carlo (Mc) Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%