The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1109/lawp.2014.2376943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Hub Location on the Performance of Wireless Body Area Networks for Fitness Applications

Abstract: Abstract-This letter compares the propagation properties of Wireless Body Area Networks for three different locations (head, foot and waist) of the hub/internet gateway on the human body. The wireless channels between the hubs and four nodes (chest, back, and upper arms) are measured for frequencies between 5 and 7 GHz on a female and a male subject performing push-ups and squats. A framework using path gain and fade depth metrics in spider plots is used for cumulative performance description. The results show… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sipal et al developed various network configuration operations for detecting link failures in all nodes of WBAN network system. The authors used hand driven operations for reducing the link failure rates between each nodes in WBAN network system.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sipal et al developed various network configuration operations for detecting link failures in all nodes of WBAN network system. The authors used hand driven operations for reducing the link failure rates between each nodes in WBAN network system.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the aforementioned receiver was designed specifically for communication between the nodes on a prosthetic limb [ 2 ] and trades sensitivity for power consumption and FDMA capability. In cases where higher path losses are expected and the number of nodes is smaller, such as in [ 15 ], a different receiver would be more optimal.…”
Section: Review Of Fm-uwb Transceiversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first type of WBAN, sensor nodes are placed inside the body, whereas in the latter, sensors node are placed on the surface of body (Chen et al, 2010). Similarly, there are two ways in which data is transferred between these sensor nodes and coordinator, i.e., Point-to-Point and Multipoint-to-Point (Sipal et al, 2015). In first type, data transfer takes place between any two sensors nodes on the body, whereas in Multipoint-to-Point, data from different sensor nodes are transferred through the same sink, i.e., a coordinator forwards the data to a server located outside the body.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%