“…It could be argued that due to the occupants' age, the case studies' thermal comfort should be evaluated according to more restrictive boundaries (category I), recommended for spaces occupied by very sensitive and fragile people, with a high level of expectation, including disabled, sick, elderly people, and very young children [29]. This would constitute grounds for a deeper discussion on which category would best fit the thermal comfort evaluation of not only these case studies, but vernacular dwellings overall, given the dichotomy between the sanitary criteria based on risk assessment for vulnerable population groups to extreme temperatures [58] and the actual moderate thermal expectation shaped by their socioeconomic background.…”